Non-magnetic coated particles having a defined parameter α of not less than 0.5

ABSTRACT

The disclosure describes a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, coated on the surface of a non-magnetic substrate comprising: 
     non-magnetic particles selected from the group consisting of particles (1) and (2): 
     (1) coated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe 2  O 3  particles which are produced by adhering not less than 0.01 to 20 wt % (calculated as Al, SiO 2  or Al and SiO 2 , and based on acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe 2  O 3  particles as a core material) of an oxide or a hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surfaces of acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe 2  O 3  particles as a core material, and have a molecular weight-dependent parameter α represented by the following formula of not less than 0.5: 
     
         As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α 
    
      wherein M represents the number-average molecular weight of a binder resin, As represents the saturation adsorption of said binder resin, and K 1  represents a constant used for measuring As and dependent on the binder resin and a solvent, 
     (2) BaO.4.5Fe 2  O 3  particles having an average particle diameter of not more than 0.1 μm; and 
     a binder resin.

This is a Division of application Ser. No. 08/240,512, filed May 10, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,015.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, a magnetic recording medium having a non-magnetic undercoating layer, and non-magnetic particles for a non-magnetic undercoating layer. More particularly, the present invention relates to a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium which has an excellent surface smoothness and a high strength, or which has an excellent surface smoothness, a high strength and protection property against oscillation (vibration proofness), a magnetic recording medium having such a non-magnetic undercoating layer, and non-magnetic particles for such a non-magnetic undercoating layer.

With a development of miniaturized and lightweight video or audio magnetic recording and reproducing apparatuses for long-time recording, magnetic recording media such as a magnetic tape and magnetic disk have been strongly required to have a higher performance, namely, a higher recording density and to reduce the noise level.

Especially, video tapes are required to have a higher picture quality, and the frequencies of carrier signals recorded in recent video tapes are higher than those recorded in conventional video tapes. In other words, the signals in the shortwave region have come to be used and, as a result, the magnetization depth from the surface of a magnetic tape has come to be remarkably small (shallow).

With respect to signals having a short wavelength, effort has also been made to improve the high output characteristics, especially, the S/N ratio, as described in the following literature. For example, Development of Magnetic Materials and Technique for High Dispersion of Magnetic Powder, published by Kabushiki Kaisha Sogo Gijutsu Center (1982) says on page 74, " . . . In the recording and reproducing characteristics, technical problems in designing a magnetic coating layer so as to produce a high recording density by achieving various requirements in electromagnetic conversion property such as a reduction in the noise level, improvement of the S/N ratio, the sensitivity and the frequency characteristics, and a reduction in the output fluctuation are (1) to improve the uniform dispersibility of magnetic particles and the magnetic orientation, (2) to increase the packing ratio of magnetic particles in a coating film, and (3) to provide a coating film with an excellent surface smoothness and a uniform thickness . . . ", and on page 312, " . . . the conditions for high-density recording in a coating type tape are that the noise level is low with respect to signals having a short wavelength and that the high output characteristics are maintained. To satisfy these conditions, it is necessary that the tape has large coercive force (Hc) and residual magnetization (Br), . . . and the coating film has a smaller thickness . . . ".

Development of a thinner film for a magnetic recording some problems.

Firstly, it is necessary to make a magnetic recording layer smooth and to eliminate the non-uniformity of thickness. As well known, in order to obtain a smooth magnetic recording layer having a uniform thickness, the surface of the base film must also be smooth. This fact is described on pages 180 and 181 of Materials for Synthetic Technology-Causes of Abrasion of Magnetic Tape and Head Running System and Measures for Solving the Problem (hereinunder referred to as "Materials for Synthetic Technology" (1987), published by the publishing department of Technology Information Center, " . . . the surface roughness of a hardened magnetic layer depends on the surface roughness of the base film (back surface roughness) so largely as to be approximately proportional, . . . since the magnetic layer is formed on the surface of the base film, the more smooth the surface of the base film is, the more uniform and larger head output is obtained and the more the S/N ratio is improved."

Secondly, a problem in the strength of a base film has been caused with a tendency of the decreased in the thickness of a base film in response to the demand for a thinner magnetic layer. This fact is described, for example, on page 77 of the above-described Development of Magnetic Materials and Technique for High Dispersion of Magnetic Powder, " . . . Higher recording density is a large problem assigned to the present magnetic tape. This is important in order to shorten the length of the tape so as to miniaturize a cassette and to enable long-time recording. For this purpose, it is necessary to reduce the thickness of a base film . . . . With the tendency of reduction in the film thickness, the stiffness of the tape also reduces to such an extent as to make smooth traveling in a recorder difficult. Therefore, improvement of the stiffness of a video tape both in the machine direction and in the transverse direction is now strongly demanded . . . . "

Thirdly, there is a problem of too large a light transmittance caused by ultra-fine magnetic particles and a thin magnetic layer. Travel of a magnetic recording medium such as a magnetic tape, especially, a video tape is stopped when the video deck detects a portion of the magnetic recording medium at which the light transmittance is large. If the light transmittance of the whole part of a magnetic recording layer is made large by the production of a thinner magnetic recording medium or the ultra-fine magnetic particles dispersed in the magnetic recording layer, it is difficult to detect the portion having a large light transmittance by a video deck. As a measure for reducing the light transmittance of the whole part of a magnetic recording layer, carbon black or the like is added to the magnetic recording layer. It is, therefore, essential to add carbon black or the like to a magnetic recording layer in the video tapes.

Also, when a magnetic tape runs, it comes into vibrating by contacting with a magnetic head. The vibration has a close relationship with the thickness of a magnetic recording layer, and the finer the magnetic particles become and the thinner the magnetic recording layer becomes, the larger the vibration of the magnetic tape is apt to become. In this case, the output envelope of the magnetic tape may lack uniformity, so that the electromagnetic conversion (signal recording) output becomes unstable. Therefore, a magnetic tape having a thin recording layer is also required almost never to vibrate when the magnetic tape runs (this property will hereinunder be referred to as "vibration proofness").

As examples of the related art regarding a magnetic recording medium composed of a non-magnetic substrate and at least one undercoating layer produced by dispersing non-magnetic particles in a binder, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) Nos. 63-187418 (1988), 4-167225 (1992) and 5-182177 (1993) will be cited.

Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 63-187418 (1988) proposes a magnetic recording medium comprising a non-magnetic substrate, at least one undercoating layer produced by dispersing non-magnetic particles in a binder, and a magnetic layer produced by dispersing ferromagnetic particles in a binder, wherein the ferromagnetic particles are ferromagnetic iron oxide particles, ferromagnetic cobalt-modified iron oxide particles or ferromagnetic alloy particles, the average major axial diameter of the ferromagnetic particles measured through a transmission electron microscope is less than 0.30 μm and the crystalline size thereof by X-ray diffraction is less than 300 Å. According to the specification of Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 63-187418 (1988), the non-magnetic particles used for the undercoating layer are carbon black, graphite, titanium oxide, barium sulfate, ZnS, MgCO₃, ZnO, CaO, γ-iron oxide, tungsten disulfite, molybdenum disulfite, boron nitride, MgO, SnO₂, SiO₂, Cr₂ O₃, α-Al₂ O₃, SiC, cerium oxide, corundum, synthetic diamond, α-iron oxide, garnet, quartzite, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, molybdenum carbide, boron carbide, tungsten carbide, titanium carbide, tripoli, diatomaceous, dolomite or the like.

Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 4-167225 (1992) proposes a magnetic recording medium produced by forming a magnetic layer on the surface of a non-magnetic substrate through an undercoating layer which contains acicular or spindle-shaped particles having an aspect ratio of more than 3.0 in a resin binder hardened when irradiated with an electromagnetic wave such as radioactive rays and ultraviolet rays.

Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 5-182177 (1993) proposes a magnetic recording medium comprising a non-magnetic substrate, a non-magnetic undercoating layer formed on the non-magnetic substrate by dispersing an inorganic powder in a binder, and an upper magnetic layer formed on the non-magnetic undercoating layer by dispersing a ferromagnetic powder in a binder while the non-magnetic undercoating layer is wet, wherein the thickness of the upper magnetic layer in the dried state is not more than 1.0 μm, and the non-magnetic undercoating layer contains a non-magnetic inorganic powder coated with an inorganic oxide. Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 5-182177 (1993) also proposes a magnetic recording medium comprising a non-magnetic substrate, a non-magnetic undercoating layer formed on the non-magnetic substrate by dispersing an inorganic powder in a binder, and an upper magnetic layer formed on the non-magnetic undercoating layer by dispersing a ferromagnetic powder in a binder while the non-magnetic undercoating layer is wet, wherein the thickness of the upper magnetic layer in the dried state is not more than 1.0 μm, the non-magnetic undercoating layer contains a non-magnetic inorganic powder coated with at least one inorganic oxide selected from the group consisting of Al₂ O₃, SiO₂ and ZrO₂, the amounts of Al₂ O₃, SiO₂ and ZrO₂ being 1 to 21 wt %, 0.04 to 20 wt % and 0.05 to 15 wt %, respectively, based on the total weight of the non-magnetic inorganic powder, the amount of the non-magnetic inorganic powder is 51 to 99.8 wt % based on the whole inorganic powder contained in the non-magnetic undercoating layer, and the non-magnetic inorganic powder contains rutile titanium dioxide as the main ingredient and 5 to 30 wt % of the inorganic oxide.

As described above, it is essential to add carbon black or the like to a magnetic recording layer in order to solve the problem of the light transmittance increasing by reducing the thickness of the magnetic recording layer.

However, addition of non-magnetic particles such as carbon black not only impairs the enhancement of the recording density but also reduces the magnetization depth from the surface of the magnetic tape. It is, therefore, unfavorable to add the non-magnetic particles to a magnetic recording layer.

With the development of a thinner film for a magnetic recording layer and a base film, a magnetic tape which has an excellent surface smoothness, a high strength and vibration proofness is now in the strongest demand, but no magnetic tape which satisfies all of these demands has been produced yet.

Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 63-187418 (1988) states that by providing at least one undercoating layer produced by dispersing non-magnetic particles in a binder on a non-magnetic substrate by the method disclosed therein, the light transmittance is improved and the problem of deterioration of the surface properties and signal recording property is solved.

As seen from the above, many materials such as hematite, barium salfate, titanium oxide, etc. are described in the specification of Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 63-187418 as non-magnetic particles and granular, acicular or spindle-shaped particles having particle diameter in a very wide range are said to be usable.

However, as a result of investigation of the above-described non-magnetic particles by the present inventors, it has been found that the surface smoothness and the strength are unsatisfactory not only when granular non-magnetic particles are used but also when acicular or spindle-shaped non-magnetic particles are used.

In the case of using acicular or spindle-shaped α-FeOOH particles which are described as the acicular or spindle-shaped particles in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 4-167225, since much crystal water is contained in the surfaces of acicular or spindle-shaped α-FeOOH particles, the conformity of the particles with a binder resin and a solvent is so poor that the desired dispersibility is not obtained.

In order to obtain a high surface smoothness in a non-magnetic undercoating layer, it is necessary to disperse non-magnetic particles in a binder resin to a very high degree. The dispersibility of coatings for a non-magnetic undercoating layer composed of non-magnetic particles, a binder resin, a solvent, etc. can be expressed by a molecular weight-dependent parameter a (hereinunder referred to merely as "parameter α"), as described on pages 94 to 96 of Explication and Applied Technique of Dispersion and Agglomeration (1992), published by Kabushiki Kaisha Technosystem, " . . . Many natural and synthetic polymers are adsorbed onto the surface of colloidal particles and form a thick adsorption layer, which exerts a great influence on the stability of the dispersion system. The following relationship generally holds between the molecular weight (M) and the saturation adsorption (As) of a polymer:

    As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α

wherein K₁ is a constant characteristic of the system, and α is called a molecular weight-dependent parameter, which is also characteristic of the system, and changes between 0 and 1 depending upon the structure of the adsorption layer. . . . When α=1, the polymer is adsorbed at the end of a molecule. The saturation adsorption (As) is proportional to the molecular weight (M). In this system, since the polymer forms a forest of the deepest adsorption layers on the particle surfaces, a strong steric repulsion effect is produced and effectively contributes to the stability of the dispersion system . . . ".

It has been found that when magnetic particles are obtained by coating the surface of an inorganic powder such as α-iron oxide with an inorganic oxide such as Al₂ O₃ and SiO₂ as described in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 5-182177 (1993), the parameters α is about 0.40 to 0.45, while the parameters a of the particles which are not subjected to such a surface coating treatment described in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 5-182177 (1993) is about 0.28 to 0.34.

Accordingly, the present invention aims at providing a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium which has an excellent surface-smoothness and a high strength, and which enables a thin magnetic recording layer having a small light transmittance, an excellent surface smoothness and a uniform thickness to be formed thereon by using α-Fe₂ O₃ particles having an excellent dispersibility which is expressed by an parameter α of larger than 0.50.

Although many materials such as γ-iron oxide, α-iron oxide, barium sulfate or the like are described in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 63-187418 (1988) and the surface smoothness and the strength of a magnetic tape are improved, the vibration proofness thereof cannot be said to be satisfactory.

Accordingly, the present invention also aims at providing a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium which has an excellent surface smoothness, a high strength and a vibration proofness, and which enables a thin magnetic recording layer having an excellent surface smoothness and a uniform thickness to be formed thereon and a vibration-proof magnetic tape to be produced therefrom.

As a result of studies undertaken by the present inventors so as to achieve such aims, it has been found that a non-magnetic undercoating layer containing the following non-magnetic particles (1) and/or (2), has an excellent surface smoothness and a high strength, and that such the non-magnetic thin magnetic recording layer provided on the undercoating layer has a small light transmittance, an excellent surface smoothness and a uniform thickness.

(1) Coated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles which are produced by adhering an oxide or a hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surfaces of acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles, and in which the molecular weight-dependent parameter α represented by the following formula is not less than 0.5:

    As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α

wherein M represents the number-average molecular weight of a binder resin, As represents the saturation adsorption of the binder resin, and K₁ represents a constant used for measuring As and dependent on the binder resin and a solvent.

(2) BaO.4.5 Fe₂ O₃ particles having an average particle diameter of not more than 0.1 μm.

On the basis of this finding, the present invention has been achieved.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to provide a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, which has an excellent surface smoothness and a high strength, and which can provide a magnetic recording medium with a thin magnetic recording layer, having a small light transmittance, an excellent surface smoothness and a uniform thickness by forming the magnetic recording layer thereon.

It is another object of the present invention to provide a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, which has an excellent surface smoothness, a high strength and a vibration proofness, and which can provide a magnetic recording medium with a thin magnetic recording layer, having an excellent surface smoothness and a uniform thickness by forming the magnetic recording layer thereon.

To achieve these aims, in a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, which is coated on the surface of a non-magnetic substrate, comprising:

non-magnetic particles selected from the group consisting of particles (1) and (2):

(1) coated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles which are mechanochemical-treated by adhering 0.01 to 20 wt % (calculated as Al, SiO₂ or Al and SiO₂, and based on acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material) of an oxide or a hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surfaces of acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material, and have a molecular weight-dependent parameter α represented by the following formula of not less than 0.5:

    As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α

wherein M represents the number-average molecular weight of a binder resin, As represents the saturation adsorption of said binder resin, and K₁ represents a constant used for measuring As and dependent on the binder resin and a solvent;

(2) BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles having an average particle diameter of not more than 0.1 μm; and

a binder resin.

In a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, which is coated on the surface of a non-magnetic substrate, comprising:

non-magnetic particles of coated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles which have an average particle diameter of not more than 0.1 μm, and are surface-treated with a coating material selected from the group consisting of aluminum compounds, silica compounds, zinc compounds, zirconium compounds, silane coupling agents, titanate coupling agents, aluminate coupling agents, zirconate coupling agents and a mixture thereof; and

a binder resin.

In a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, which is coated on the surface of a non-magnetic substrate, comprising:

non-magnetic particles of coated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles which have an average particle diameter of not more than 0.1 μm, are mechanochemical-treated by adhering 0.01 to 20 wt % (calculated as Al, SiO₂ or Al and SiO₂, and based on BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material) of an oxide or a hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surfaces of BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material, and have a molecular weight-dependent parameter α represented by the following formula of not less than 0.5:

    As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α

wherein M represents the number-average molecular weight of a binder resin, As represents the saturation adsorption of said binder resin, and K₁ represents a constant used for measuring As and dependent on the binder resin and a solvent; and

a binder resin.

In a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, which is coated on the surface of a non-magnetic substrate, comprising:

non-magnetic particles of coated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles which are mechanochemical-treated by adhering 0.01 to 20 wt % (calculated as Al, SiO₂ or Al and SiO₂, and based on acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material) of an oxide or a hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surfaces of acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material, and have a molecular weight-dependent parameter α represented by the following formula of not less than 0.5:

    As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α

wherein M represents the number-average molecular weight of a binder resin, As represents the saturation adsorption of said binder resin, and K₁ represents a constant used for measuring As and dependent on the binder resin and a solvent, which the non-magnetic particles are obtained by adding an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles to adjust the pH of said suspension to not less than 10, adding an aqueous solution containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the resultant suspension, adjusting the pH of the resultant suspension to approximately the neutrality under stirring so as to quickly precipitate an oxide or hydroxide of Al, Si or both Al and Si, filtering out the obtained particles with said oxide or hydroxide so as to obtain a solid substance, washing with water and drying said solid substance, and compacting and pulverizing said solid substance by an edge runner mill; and

a binder resin.

In a fifth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, which is coated on the surface of a non-magnetic substrate, comprising:

non-magnetic particles of coated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles which are mechanochemical-treated by adhering 0.01 to 20 wt % (calculated as Al, SiO₂ or Al and SiO₂, and based on acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material) of an oxide or a hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surfaces of acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material, and have a molecular-weight-dependent parameter α represented by the following formula of not less than 0.5:

    As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α

wherein M represents the number-average molecular weight of a binder resin, As represents the saturation adsorption of said binder resin, and K₁ represents a constant used for measuring As and dependent on the binder resin and a solvent, which the non-magnetic particles are obtained by adding an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles to adjust the pH of said suspension to not less than 10, adding an aqueous solution containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the resultant suspension, adjusting the pH of the resultant suspension to approximately the neutrality under stirring so as to quickly precipitate an oxide or hydroxide of Al, Si or both Al and Si, filtering out the obtained particles with said oxide or hydroxide so as to obtain a solid substance, washing with water and drying said solid substance, and compacting and pulverizing said solid substance by an edge runner mill, and repeating the steps taken from the addition of said aqueous alkali solution to said aqueous suspension containing said particles so as to adjust the pH of said suspension to not less than 10 to the compaction and pulverization of said solid substance at least twice; and

a binder resin.

In a sixth aspect of the present invention, there is provided coated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles for a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, which are mechanochemical-treated by adhering 0.01 to 20 wt % (calculated as Al, SiO₂ or Al and SiO₂, and based on acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material) of an oxide or a hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surfaces of acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material, and have a molecular-weight-dependent parameter α represented by the following formula is not less than 0.5:

    As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α

wherein M represents the number-average molecular weight of a binder resin, As represents the saturation adsorption of said binder resin, and K₁ represents a constant used for measuring As and dependent on said binder resin and a solvent.

In a seventh aspect of the present invention there is provided coated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles for a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, which have an average particle diameter of not more than 0.1 μm, and are surface-treared with a coating material selected from the group consisting of aluminum compounds, silica compounds, zinc compounds, zirconium compounds, silane coupling agents, titanate coupling agents, aluminate coupling agents, zirconate coupling agents and a mixture thereof.

In an eighth aspect of the present invention, there is provided coated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles for a non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, which have an average particle diameter of not more than 0.1 μm, are mechanochemical-treated by adhering 0.01 to 20 wt % (calculated as Al, SiO₂ or Al and SiO₂, and based on BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material) of an oxide or a hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surfaces of BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material, and have a molecular-weight-dependent parameter α represented by the following formula of not less than 0.5:

    As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α

wherein M represents the number-average molecular weight of a binder resin, As represents the saturation adsorption of said binder resin, and K₁ represents a constant used for measuring As and dependent on the binder resin and a solvent.

In a ninth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a magnetic recording medium, comprising:

a non-magnetic substrate;

a non-magnetic undercoating layer composed of non-magnetic particles and a binder resin, and formed on the surface of the non-magnetic substrate,

non-magnetic particles being particles selected from the group consisting of particles (1) and (2):

(1) coated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles which are mechanochemical-treated by adhering 0.01 to 20 wt % (calculated as Al, SiO₂ or Al and SiO₂, and based on acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material) of an oxide or a hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surfaces of acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core material, and have a molecular weight-dependent parameter α represented by the following formula of not less than 0.5:

    As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α

wherein M represents the number-average molecular weight of a binder resin, As represents the saturation adsorption of said binder resin, and K₁ represents a constant used for measuring As and dependent on the binder resin and a solvent,

(2) BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles having an average particle diameter of not more than 0.1 μm; and

a magnetic recording layer composed of magnetic particles and a binder resin, and formed on said non-magnetic undercoating layer.

BRIEF EXPLANATION OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 is an electron micrograph (×100,000) of the structure of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles produced in Example 17.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The precursor particles for the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles used in the present invention are acicular or spindle-shaped goethite particles generally produced by:

(1) a process of oxidizing a suspension containing colloidal ferrous hydroxide particles and having a pH of not less than 11 which is obtained by adding not less than an equivalent of an alkali hydroxide solution to an aqueous ferrous salt solution, by passing an oxygen-containing gas thereinto at a temperature of not higher than 80° C.;

(2) a process of producing spindle-shaped goethite particles by oxidizing a suspension containing FeCO₃ which is obtained by reacting an aqueous ferrous salt solution with an aqueous alkali carbonate solution, by passing an oxygen-containing gas thereinto;

(3) a process of generating acicular or spindle-shaped seed goethite particles by oxidizing a ferrous hydroxide solution containing colloidal ferrous salt particles which is obtained by adding less than an equivalent of an alkali hydroxide solution or an alkali carbonate solution to an aqueous ferrous salt solution, by passing an oxygen-containing gas thereinto, adding not less than an equivalent of an alkali hydroxide solution to the aqueous ferrous salt solution containing the acicular or spindle-shaped goethite seed particles, and growing the acicular or spindle-shaped seed goethite particles by passing an oxygen-containing gas into the aqueous ferrous salt solution; and

(4) a process of producing acicular or spindle-shaped goethite particles by oxidizing a ferrous salt solution containing colloidal ferrous hydroxide particles which are obtained by adding less than an equivalent of an alkali hydroxide solution or an alkali carbonate solution to an aqueous ferrous salt solution, by passing an oxygen-containing gas thereinto, and growing the acicular or spindle-shaped seed goethite particles in an acidic or neutral region.

The precursor particles obtained are heated, dehydrated and, if necessary, further heat-treated, thereby obtaining acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles. Alternatively, the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles may be produced directly by oxidizing an aqueous solution containing FeCO₃ passing an oxygen-containing gas (refer to Japanese Patent Publication (KOKOKU) Nos. 4-15172, 4-55979 and 5-57214, and Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 62-128930).

Elements other than Fe such as Ni, Zn, P and Si which are generally added in order to enhance properties of the particles may be added during the reaction for producing the goethite particles.

By dehydrating the acicular or spindle-shaped particles as the precursor particles at a temperature of 200° to 500° C. and heat-treating (annealing) the dehydrated particles, if necessary, at a temperature of 350° to 800° C., acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles are obtained.

There is no problem even if there is a sintering preventive such as P, Si, B, Zr and Sb on the surface of the acicular or spindle-shaped goethite particles.

It is preferable to heat-treat (anneal) the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles at a temperature of 350° to 800° C., because due to the heat-melting the surfaces of the particles, the pores in the surfaces of the dehydrated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles are filled in, and a smooth surface is obtained.

The acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles with an oxide or a hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si adhered (coated) to the surfaces thereof used in the present invention are produced by (i) steps of adding an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles which are produced by the above-mentioned process to obtain a suspension having a pH of to not less than 10, adding an aqueous solution containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the resultant suspension, adjusting the pH of the resultant suspension to approximately the neutrality under stirring so as to quickly precipitate an oxide or hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si, filtering out the obtained particles with said oxide or hydroxide deposited and/or precipitated on the surface or periphery thereof, washing with water and drying the obtained solid substance, and compacting and pulverizing the solid substance by an edge runner mill so as to adhere an oxide or hydroxide containing Al and/or Si to the surface of the acicular or spindle-shaped particles; or

(ii) steps of repeating the above-mentioned steps taken from said step of adding an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles to obtain a suspension having a pH of not less than 10 to the step of compacting and pulverizing the solid substance by an edge runner mill at least twice to adhere an oxide or hydroxide containing Al and/or Si to the surface of the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles.

In the above-mentioned process, after adding an aqueous alkali solution to the aqueous suspension containing the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles to obtain the suspension having a pH to not less than 10, by adding an aqueous solution containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the resultant suspension, the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles can be sufficiently and uniformly mixed in the aqueous suspension because of the electric repulsion of the particles therein.

As the aqueous alkali solution for adjusting the pH of the suspension to not less than 10, aqueous solutions of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, ammonia water, etc. are usable.

As the aqueous solution containing Al, an aqueous solution of an alkali aluminate such as sodium aluminate and potassium aluminate, and an aqueous solution of an aluminum salt such as aluminum sulfate, aluminum chloride and aluminum nitrate are usable.

The amount of Al compound added is 0.01 to 20.0 wt % (calculated as Al) based on the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles. If the amount is less than 0.01 wt %, the dispersibility in the binder resin is insufficient. Although the advantages aimed at in the present invention are obtained even if the amount exceeds 20.0 wt %, since the approximately full advantages are achieved, the addition of more than 20.0 wt % of the Al compound is not industrially expedient. With due consideration for the dispersibility of the target particles, the amount of Al compound added is preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as Al) based on the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles.

As the aqueous solution containing Si, aqueous solutions of sodium silicate, potassium silicate, colloidal silica, water glass #3 and the like are usable.

The amount of Si compound added is 0.01 to 20.0 wt % (calculated as SiO₂) based on the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles. If the amount is less than 0.01 wt %, the dispersibility in the binder resin is insufficient. Although the advantages aimed at in the present invention are obtained even if the amount exceeds 20.0 wt %, since the approximately full advantages are achieved, the addition of more than 20.0 wt % of the Si compound is not industrially expedient. With due consideration for the dispersibility of the target particles, the amount of Si compound added is preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as SiO₂) based on the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles.

When a mixture of an aqueous solution containing Al and an aqueous solution containing Si is added to the suspension in the present invention, the amount of mixed solution added is 0.01 to 20.0 wt %, preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as the total amount of Al and SiO₂) based on the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles.

If the steps taken from the addition of an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles so as to adjust the pH of the suspension to not less than 10 to the compaction and pulverization of the solid substances composed of the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles by an edge runner mill which will be described later are repeated at least twice,come amount of Al compound and/or Si compound added each time is determined with due consideration for the sum of the above-described amount of each compound. It is preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as the total amount of Al and SiO₂) based on the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles.

It is in order to adequately and uniformly mix the compound in the suspension containing the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles having a pH of not less than 10 that the Al compound and/or the Si compound is added in the form of an aqueous solution. It is also possible to adequately dissolve and mix the Al compound and/or the Si compound in and with the suspension by adding it in the form of a crystal salt.

In the present invention, an aqueous solution of the Al compound and/or the Si compound is added to the suspension containing the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles having a pH of not less than 10, and the pH of the resultant suspension is rapidly adjusted to approximately the neutrality (6.5 to 8.5) under stirring so as to quickly precipitate substantially the total amount of Al and/or Si as an oxide or hydroxide thereof and produce a solid substance of the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles with an oxide or hydroxide thereof.

The time for adjusting the pH of the suspension for precipitating an oxide or hydroxide containing each element is in the range of 1 to 10 minutes. If the time exceeds 10 minutes, the oxide or hydroxide of Al and/or Si is sometimes precipitated on the surfaces of the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles in layers. Therefore, after the precipitation of the oxide or hydroxide, the solid substance composed of the particles with the oxide or hydroxide are promptly filtered out under the ordinary conditions. The time may be less than 1 minute but it takes at least about 1 minute to precipitate Al and/or Si as an oxide or hydroxide.

As the acid for adjusting the pH of the suspension, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, nitric acid, carbon dioxide gas, etc. are usable.

In order to enhance the strength and the durability of the non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium while reducing the amount of solvent remaining in the undercoating layer after the coating film is dried, it is preferable to add a compound of one selected from the group consisting of Zn, Co, Ni, V, Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Bi and P in addition to the Al compound and/or the Si compound. In order to enhance the mechanical strength (scratch resistance) and the running durability while reducing the friction coefficient, it is preferable to add a compound of one selected from the group consisting of Zr, Ti, Hf and Mo in addition to the Al compound and/or the Si compound. In order to enhance the surface smoothness and the electrification property while reducing the surface resistance, it is preferable to add a compound of one selected from the group consisting of Sn, Sb, Ag, Pd, Cu and Fe in addition to the Al compound and/or the Si compound. Each of these compounds may be used in the form of a water-soluble salt such as sulfate, chloride and nitrate of each element.

These compounds may be appropriately combined with each other in accordance with the object of addition and the nature of each element, and the amount of compound added is 0.01 to 20.0 wt % (calculated as each element) based on the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ articles. If the amount is less than 0.01 wt %, the dispersibility in the binder resin is insufficient. Although the advantages aimed at in the present invention are obtained even if the amount exceeds 20.0 wt %, since the advantages are saturated, the addition of more than 20.0 wt % of each compound is industrially useless. With due consideration for the dispersibility of the target particles, the amount of each compound added is preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as each element) based on the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ articles.

Among the above-described elements, Ca, St and Ba sometimes elute when substantially the total amount of precipitated oxide or hydroxide particles thereof are washed. To prevent this, they are preferably subjected to the following treatments. When a Ca compound is used and the suspension containing the Ca compound is neutralized with the above-described acid other than carbon dioxide gas, after the pH of the suspension is adjusted, a slight amount of carbon dioxide gas is blown into the suspension so as to bubble it. By this treatment, Ca ions are combined with carbon dioxide as CaCO₃, so that Ca is unlikely to elute. The same treatment may be adopted when an Sr compound is used so that Sr ions are combined with carbon dioxide as SrCO₃ and Sr is unlikely to elute. When a Ba compound is used, the suspension containing the Ba compound is preferably neutralized with sulfuric acid. When an acid other than sulfuric acid is used as the neutralizer, it is preferable to add sulfuric acid after the adjustment of the pH so as to combine Ba ions therewith as BaSO₄, whereby Ba ions are unlikely to elute.

The solid substances composed of the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles and the oxide or hydroxide is filtered out, washed with water and dried by an ordinary method.

Since the solid substances exists by the interaction thereof, filtration, washing with water and drying of the mixture may be conducted by an ordinary method without particularly deteriorating the operability.

As the edge runner mill used for the compaction and pulverization of the solid substance in the present invention, "Sand Mill" manufactured by Kabushiki Kaisha Matsumoto Chuzo Tekkosho and "Mix Muller" manufactured by Shinto Industry Co., Ltd., etc. are usable.

The line load of the edge runner mill is 15 to 80 kg/cm, preferably 30 to 60 kg/cm. If the line load is less than 15 kg/cm, since the shearing force during grinding is too weak, it is impossible to exert the mechanochemical effect. On the other hand, if the line load exceeds 80 kg/cm, there is a fear of the particles themselves being broken. The treating time is 15 to 120 minutes, preferably 30 to 60 minutes.

In the present invention, the steps taken from the adding step of an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles to obtain a suspension having a pH of not less than 10 to the compaction and pulverization step of the solid substances of the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles with the oxide or hydroxide by an edge runner mill may be repeated twice or more, preferably two to five times. Although the advantages aimed at in the present invention are obtained even if the steps are repeated more than five times, approximately full advantages are achieved so that repeating the steps more is not industrially expedient.

The average major axial diameter of the coated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles in the present invention is 0.05 to 0.25 μm, preferably 0.08 to 0.20 μm, the minor axial diameter is 0.010 to 0.035 μm, preferably 0.012 to 0.030 μm, the particle size distribution thereof in geometrical standard deviation is not more than 1.40, preferably 1.05 to 1.38 and the aspect ratio (major axial diameter/minor axial diameter) thereof is 2 to 20, preferably 3 to 10.

If the average major axial diameter is less than 0.05 μm, dispersion in the binder is unfavorably difficult. On the other hand if the average major axial diameter exceeds 0.25 μm, the particle size is so large as to impair the surface smoothness.

If the average minor axial diameter is less than 0.010 μm, dispersion in the binder is unfavorably difficult. On the other hand if the average minor axial diameter exceeds 0.035 μm, the particle size is so large as to impair the surface smoothness.

If the particle size distribution in geometrical standard deviation exceeds 1.40, the coarse particles exert deleterious influence on the surface smoothness of the coated film.

If the aspect ratio is less than 2, it is difficult to provide the coated film with the desired strength. On the other hand, if the aspect ratio exceeds 20, the interaction between the particles increases so much as to exert deleterious influence on the dispersion.

On the other hand, the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles in the present invention are non-magnetic particles having an average particle diameter of less than about 0.1 μm. With consideration for the dispersibility of the particles in a vehicle, the particle size is preferably in the range of 0.005 to 0.05 μm, more preferably 0.01 to 0.04 μm.

The BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles are obtained by an autoclaving process of an alkali suspension which contains a ferric salt and Ba ions in the atomic ratio of Fe³⁺ to Ba of 6 to 8/1 in a temperature range of 110° to 190° C. (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 61-40007 (1986)), or by a process of blowing an oxidizing gas into an alkali Fe(OH)₂ suspension containing Ba ions in a temperature range of 35° to 95° C., thereby oxidizing Fe²⁺ simultaneously with stirring of the suspension (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 62-52133 (1988)).

The advantages aimed at in the present invention are also obtained when the suspension contains elements such as Co, Ti, Ni, Zn, P and Si, which are ordinarily added in order to enhance the properties of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles or elements such as Mn and Mg derived from an iron raw material, a barium raw material, an alkali raw material and another raw material in the form of coprecipitates during the process of producing the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

The surface treatment of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles which is ordinarily conducted for the purpose of improving the dispersibility of the particles in a vehicle can increase the packing amount of the particles in the undercoating layer, which leads to the enhancement of the vibration proofness.

As the surface-treating agent of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles, at least one selected from the group consisting of aluminum compound, silica compound, zinc compound, zirconium compound and coupling agent is usable. The preferred surface treating agent is an aluminum compound, a coupling agent or a combination thereof.

The surface treatment of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles may be conducted when the particles are in the form of a cake or a slurry after washed with water, or dried. Preferably the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles in the form of a cake or a slurry are subjected to surface treatment.

The surface treatment of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles with aluminum compound, silica compound, zinc compound, zirconium compound or a mixture thereof is conducted by (i) dispersing and suspending the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles in a solution containing aluminum compound, silica compound, zinc compound, zirconium compound or a mixture thereof; or (ii) adding aluminum compound, silica compound, zinc compound, zirconium compound or a mixture thereof to an aqueous suspension containing the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles and adjusting the pH of the suspension, so as to coat the surfaces of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles with an oxide and/or a hydroxide of aluminum, silica, zinc, zirconium or a mixture thereof, filtering out, washing with water, drying, pulverizing and, if necessary, deaerating and compacting the coated particles.

As the aluminum compound, an aluminum salt such as aluminum acetate, aluminum sulfate, aluminum chloride and aluminum nitrate and alkali salts such as aluminum salt and sodium aluminate are usable.

As the silica compound, sodium silicate, potassium silicate, colloidal silica and water glass #3 are usable.

As the zinc compound, zinc acetate, zinc sulfate, zinc chloride and zinc nitrate and are usable.

As/ the zirconium compound, zirconium acetate, zirconium sulfate, zirconyl sulfate, zirconium chloride, zirconyl chloride, zirconium nitrate and zirconyl nitrate are usable.

The amount of aluminum compound added is 0.01 to 50.00 wt % (calculated as Al) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles. If the amount is less than 0.01 wt %, the dispersibility in the binder resin is insufficient. On the other hand, if the amount exceeds 50.00 wt %, it is unfavorable because the hydroxide fine particles and the like of aluminum floating outside the surfaces of the particles interact. The amount of aluminum compound coating the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles is preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as Al) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

The amount of silica compound added is 0.01 to 50.00 wt % (calculated as SiO₂) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles. If the amount is less than 0.01 wt %, the dispersibility in the binder resin is insufficient. On the other hand, if the amount exceeds 50.00 wt %, it is unfavorable because the hydroxide fine particles and the like of silicon floating outside the surfaces of the particles interact. The amount of silica compound coating the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles is preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as SiO₂) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

The amount of zinc compound added is 0.01 to 50.00 wt % (calculated as Zn) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles. If the amount is less than 0.01 wt %, the dispersibility in the binder resin is insufficient. On the other hand, if the amount exceeds 50.00 wt %, it is unfavorable because the hydroxide fine particles and the like of zinc floating outside the surfaces of the particles interact. The amount of zinc compound coating the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles is preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as Zn) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

The amount of zirconium compound added is 0.01 to 50.00 wt % (calculated as Zr) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles. If the amount is less than 0.01 wt %, the dispersibility in the binder resin is insufficient. On the other hand, if the amount exceeds 50.00 wt %, it is unfavorable because the hydroxide fine particles and the like of zirconium floating outside the surfaces of the particles interact. The amount of zirconium compound coating the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles is preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as Zr) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

When a mixture of at least two selected from the group consisting of aluminum compound, silica compound, zinc compound and zirconium compound is used, the amount of mixture added is 0.01 to 50.00 wt % (calculated as Al, SiO₂, Zn and Zr) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles. The amount of mixture coating the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles is preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as Al, SiO₂, Zn and Zr) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

The surface treatment of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles with a coupling agent is conducted by, for example, (i) a dry process of charging the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles into a mixer such as a Henschel mixer and an edge runner mill, adding a predetermined amount of coupling agent, and mixing them; and (ii) a wet process of adding a coupling agent, in the form of an emulsion, an alcoholic solution or as it is when the coupling agent is water-soluble, to an aqueous suspension containing the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles, heating and aging, if necessary, so as to coat the surfaces of the particles with the dehydrated condensate of the coupling agent, filtering, washing with water, drying and pulverizing the coated particles.

As the coupling agent, silane coupling agents, titanate coupling agents, aluminate coupling agents and zirconate coupling agents are usable.

Examples of the titanate coupling agents are water-soluble coupling agents such as triethanolamine titanate chelate, lactic acid titanate chelate and isopropyltri(N-aminoethyl.aminoethyl) titanate; and coupling agents which are soluble to an organic solvent as a liquid dispersion medium, such as isopropyltristearoyl titanate, isopropyltris(dioctylpyrophosphate) titanate, isopropyltri(N-aminoethyl aminoethyl) titanate, tetraoctylbis(ditridecyl phosphate) titanate, tetra(2-2-diallyloxymethyl-1-butyl)bis(ditridecyl) phosphate titanate, bis(dioctylpyrophosphate) oxyacetate titanate and bis(dioctylpyrophosphate) ethylenetitanate.

Examples of the silane coupling agents are vinyltriethoxysilane, vinyltrimethoxysilane, vinyltrichlorosilane, vinyltris(βmethoxyethoxy)silane, γ-(methacryloxypropyl)trimethoxysilane, γ-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane, N-B-(aminoethyl)γ-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane, β-(3,4 epoxycyclohexyl)ethyltrimethoxysilane, γ-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane and γ-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane, which are soluble to an organic solvent as a liquid dispersion medium.

Examples of the aluminate coupling agents are acetoalkoxyaluminum diisopropylate, aluminum diisopropoxymonoethyl acetoacetate, aluminum trisethyl acetoacetate and aluminum trisacetylacetonate, which are soluble to an organic solvent as a liquid dispersion medium.

Examples of the zirconate coupling agents are zirconium tetrakis acetylacetonate, zirconium dibuthoxybis acetylacetonate, zirconium tetrakisethyl acetoacetate, zirconium tributhoxymonoethyl acetoacetate and zirconium tributhoxy acetylacetonate, which are soluble to an organic solvent as a liquid dispersion medium.

The amount of dehydrate condensate of the coupling agent which is coated on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles, is 0.01 to 20.0 wt %, preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as C) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

The surface-treated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles in the present invention are non-magnetic particles having an average particle diameter of not more than 0.1 μm, preferably 0.005 to 0.05 μm, more preferably 0.01 to 0.04 μm.

The mechanochemical treatment of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles which is ordinarily conducted for the purpose of improving the dispersibility of the particles in a vehicle can increase the packing amount of the particles in the undercoating layer, which leads to the enhancement of the vibration proofness.

The granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles with an oxide or a hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si adhered (coated) to the surfaces thereof used in the present invention are produced by (i) steps of adding an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles which are produced by the above-mentioned process to obtain a suspension having a pH of to not less than 10, adding an aqueous solution containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the resultant suspension, adjusting the pH of the resultant suspension to approximately the neutrality under stirring so as to quickly precipitate an oxide or hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si, filtering out the obtained particles with said oxide or hydroxide deposited and/or precipitated on the surface or periphery thereof, washing with water and drying the obtained solid substance, and compacting and pulverizing the solid substance by an edge runner mill so as to adhere an oxide or hydroxide containing Al and/or Si to the surface of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles; or (ii) steps of repeating the above-mentioned steps taken from said step of adding an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles to obtain a suspension having a pH of not less than 10 to the step of compacting and pulverizing the solid substance by an edge runner mill at least twice to adhere an oxide or hydroxide containing Al and/or Si to the surface of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

In the above-mentioned process, after adding an aqueous alkali solution to the aqueous suspension containing the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles to obtain the suspension having a pH to not less than 10, by adding an aqueous solution containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the resultant suspension, the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles can be sufficiently and uniformly mixed in the aqueous suspension because of the electric repulsion of the particles therein.

As the aqueous alkali solution for adjusting the pH of the suspension to not less than 10, aqueous solutions of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, ammonia water, etc. are usable.

As the aqueous solution containing Al, an aqueous solution of an alkali aluminate such as sodium aluminate and potassium aluminate, and an aqueous solution of an aluminum salt such as aluminum sulfate, aluminum chloride and aluminum nitrate are usable.

The amount of Al compound added is 0.01 to 20.0 wt % (calculated as Al) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles. With due consideration for the dispersibility of the target particles, the amount of Al compound added is preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as Al) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

As the aqueous solution containing Si, aqueous solutions of sodium silicate, potassium silicate, colloidal silica, water glass #3 and the like are usable.

The amount of Si compound added is 0.01 to 20.0 wt % (calculated as SiO₂) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles. With due consideration for the dispersibility of the target particles, the amount of Si compound added is preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as SiO₂) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

When a mixture of an aqueous solution containing Al and an aqueous solution containing Si is added to the suspension in the present invention, the amount of mixed solution added is 0.01 to 20.0 wt %, preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt % (calculated as the total amount of Al and SiO₂) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

If the steps taken from the addition of an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles so as to adjust the pH of the suspension to not less than 10 to the compaction and pulverization of the solid substances composed of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles by an edge runner mill which will be described later are repeated at least twice, the amount of Al compound and/or Si compound added each time is determined with due consideration for the sum of the above-described amount of each compound. It is preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt %.

In the present invention, an aqueous solution of the Al compound and/or the Si COMPOUND IS added to the suspension containing the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles having a pH of not less than 10, and the pH of the resultant suspension is rapidly adjusted to approximately the neutrality (6.5 to 8.5) under stirring so as to quickly precipitate substantially the total amount of Al and/or Si as an oxide or hydroxide thereof and produce a solid substance of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles with an oxide or hydroxide thereof.

The time for adjusting the pH of the suspension for precipitating an oxide or hydroxide containing each element is in the range of 1 to 10 minutes. If the time exceeds 10 minutes, the oxide or hydroxide of Al and/or Si is sometimes precipitated on the surfaces of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles in layers. Therefore, after the precipitation of the oxide or hydroxide, the solid substance composed of the particles with the oxide or hydroxide are promptly filtered out under the ordinary conditions. The time may be less than 10 minute but it takes at least about 1 minute to precipitate Al and/or Si as an oxide or hydroxide.

As the acid for adjusting the pH of the suspension, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, nitric acid, carbon dioxide gas, etc. are usable.

In order to enhance the strength and the durability of the non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium while reducing the amount of solvent remaining in the undercoating layer after the coating film is dried, it is preferable to add a compound of one selected from the group consisting of Zn, Co, Ni, V, Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Bi and P in addition to the Al compound and/or the Si compound. In order to enhance the mechanical strength (scratch resistance) and the running durability while reducing the friction coefficient, it is preferable to add a compound of one selected from the group consisting of Zr, Ti, Hf and Mo in addition to the Al compound and/or the Si compound. In order to enhance the surface smoothness and the electrification property while reducing the surface resistance, it is preferable to add a compound of one selected from the group consisting of Sn, Sb, Ag, Pd, Cu and Fe in addition to the Al compound and/or the Si compound. Each of these compounds may be used in the form of a water-soluble salt such as sulfate, chloride and nitrate of each element.

These compounds may be appropriately combined with each other in accordance with the object of addition and the nature of each element, and the amount of compound added is 0.01 to 20.0 wt % (calculated as each element) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles. With due consideration for the dispersibility of the target particles, the amount of each compound added is preferably 0.05 to 10.0 wt %.

Among the above-described elements, Ca, Sr and Ba sometimes elute when substantially the total amount of precipitated oxide or hydroxide particles thereof are washed. To prevent this, they are preferably subjected to the following treatments. When a Ca compound is used and the suspension containing the Ca compound is neutralized with the above-described acid other than carbon dioxide, after the pH of the suspension is adjusted, a slight amount of carbon dioxide gas is blown into the suspension so as to bubble it. By this treatment, Ca ions are combined with carbon dioxide as CaCO₃, so that Ca is unlikely to elute. The same treatment may be adopted when an Sr compound is used so that Sr ions are combined with carbon dioxide as SrCO₃ and Sr is unlikely to elute. When a Ba compound is used, the suspension containing the Ba compound is preferably neutralized with sulfuric acid. When an acid other than sulfuric acid is used as the neutralizer, it is preferable to add sulfuric acid after the adjustment of the pH so as to combine Ba ions therewith as BaSO₄, whereby Ba ions are unlikely to elute.

The solid substances composed of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles and the oxide or hydroxide is filtered out, washed with water and dried by an ordinary method. Since the solid substances exists by the interaction thereof, filtration, washing with water and drying of the mixture may be conducted by an ordinary method without particularly deteriorating the operability.

As the edge runner mill used for the compaction and pulverization of the solid substance in the present invention, "Sand Mill" manufactured by Kabushiki Kaisha Matsumoto Chuzo Tekkosho and "Mix Muller" manufactured by Shinto Industry Co., Ltd., etc. are usable.

The line load of the edge runner mill is 15 to 80 kg/cm, preferably 30 to 60 kg/cm. If the line load is less than 15 kg/cm, since the shearing force during grinding is too weak, it is impossible to exert the mechanochemical effect. On the other hand, if the line load exceeds 80 kg/cm, there is a fear of the particles themselves being broken. The treating time is 15 to 120 minutes, preferably 30 to 60 minutes.

In the present invention, the steps taken from the adding step of an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles to obtain a suspension having a pH of not less than 10 to the compaction and pulverization step of the solid substances of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles with the oxide or hydroxide by an edge runner mill may be repeated twice or more, preferably two to five times. Although the advantages aimed at in the present invention are obtained even if the steps are repeated more than five times, approximately full advantages are achieved so that repeating the steps more is not industrially expedient.

As the binder resin in the present invention, the following resins which are at present generally used for the production of a magnetic recording medium are usable. For example, vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate copolymer, urethane resin, vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate urethane-maleate elastomer, butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer, polyvinyl butyral, cellulose derivative such as nitrocellulose, polyester, synthetic rubber resin such as polybutadiene, epoxy resin, polyamide, polyisocyanate, electron radiation curing acryl urethane resin and mixtures thereof may be exemplified. Each of these resin binders may contain a polar group such as --OH, --COOH, --SO₃ M, OPO₂ M₂ and --NH₂, wherein M represents H, Na or K.

A non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium according to the present invention is obtained by forming a coating film by coating the surface of a non-magnetic substrate with a coating film composition composed of the coated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles, the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles, the coated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles and/or the surface-treated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles of the present invention and a binder resin.

It is possible to add a lubricant, a polishing agent, an antistatic agent, etc. which are generally used for the production of a magnetic recording medium to the non-magnetic undercoating layer.

As the non-magnetic substrate, the following materials which are at present generally used for the production of a magnetic recording medium are usable. For example, a synthetic resin film such as polyethylene terephthalate, polyethylene, polypropylene, polycarbonate, polyethylene naphthalate, polyamide, polyamideimide and polyimide, film foil and plate of a metal such as aluminum and stainless steel, and various kinds of paper may be exemplified.

The thickness of the undercoating layer obtained by coating a non-magnetic substrate with a coating film composition and drying the coating composition is 1 to 10 μm. If the thickness is less than 1 μm, not only it is impossible to improve the surface roughness of the base film but also the strength is insufficient. Even if the thickness exceeds 10 μm, the desired properties are obtained, but in order to obtain a thin magnetic recording medium, it is preferable to form to produce an undercoating layer of not more than 10 μm in thickness. The preferred thickness is 2 to 4 μm.

A magnetic recording medium of the present invention is obtained by forming a magnetic recording layer on the non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium according to the present invention by coating the non-magnetic undercoating layer with a coating film composition containing magnetic particles and a binder resin.

It is possible to add to the magnetic layer, a lubricant, a polishing agent, an antistatic agent, etc. which are generally used for the production of a magnetic recording medium.

As the magnetic particles in the magnetic recording layer are usable magnetic iron oxide particles such as maghemite particles, magnetite particles, berthollide particles as an intermediate oxide of maghemite and magnetite; magnetic iron oxide particles containing elements other than Fe such as Co, Al, Ni, P, Zn, Si and B; magnetic iron oxide particles coated with Co or the like; magnetic metal particles containing iron as the main ingredient; magnetic iron-based alloy particles containing elements other than iron such as Co, Al, Ni, P, Zn, Si, B or the like; plate-like Ba ferrite particles and plate-like composite ferrite particles containing divalent metal such as Co, Ni and Zn and a quadrivalent metal such as Ti, Sn and Zr as coercive force reducing agents. The shape of the magnetic particles is not specified and, for example, acicular or spindle-shaped, spindle-shaped, cubic and plate-like particles are usable.

As the binder resin in the magnetic recording layer, the same resin as that used in the formation of the undercoating layer may be used.

The non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium according to the present invention is excellent in the surface smoothness and the strength, so that it is possible to obtain a thin magnetic recording layer having a small light transmittance, an excellent surface smoothness, a uniform thickness and a high strength when a magnetic recording medium is produced by coating the surface of the non-magnetic undercoating layer with a coating film composition containing magnetic particles and a binder resin.

The reason why the non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium according to the present invention is excellent in the surface smoothness and the strength is as follows.

It is possible to orient the acicular or spindle-shaped particles at the time of coating the surface of a non-magnetic substrate, and the oriented acicular or spindle-shaped particles make the light transmittance of the coating layer small and enhance the surface smoothness and the strength thereof, as described on page 339 of Materials for Synthetic Technology, " . . . Pigment particles such as acicular or spindle-shaped γ-Fe₂ O₃ particles which are regarded as rod-like particles are oriented in parallel to the surface of a substrate when the surface is coated with the pigment particles in such a manner that a shearing force is applied thereto . . . . The rod-like particles which are oriented parallel to the surface of the substrate have larger obliterating power and gloss and smaller light or gas transmittance than rod-like particles which are oriented vertical to the surface of the substrate. The difference in the orientation of the pigment particles also influences the mechanical properties of the coating film. That is, the closer to the horizontal orientation to the surface of the substrate, the higher the strength is and the smaller the elongation is . . . "

However, the dispersibility of the particles is a problem, as described on page 343 of Materials for Synthetic Technology, " . . . If the dispersibility of the magnetic particles is poor, not only is the surface smoothness deteriorated but also the orientation is influenced so that the magnetic characteristics are deteriorated . . . . "

As a result of investigations of various non-magnetic particles which can enhance the surface smoothness and the strength, it is considered by the present inventors that by using of the same iron oxide particles as the magnetic particles used in the magnetic recording layer as the non-magnetic particles for the undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, the conformity with a binder resin is enhanced when the base film is coated therewith, and that the adhesiveness and the durability are also increased. For this reason, acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles are selected as the non-magnetic particles.

However, since it is impossible to obtain a sufficient orientation, an excellent surface smoothness or an adequate strength by coating the base film with a composition obtained only by dispersing acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles in a resin binder, various studies have been undertaken in order to make acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles easy to disperse in the binder resin.

Regarding the dispersibility of the particles, the parameter α in the α-Fe₂ O₃ particles coated with an Al compound and/or an Si compound in accordance with the method described in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 5-182177 (1993) is as low as 0.40 to 0.45, as described above. The present inventors consider that as described in the specification thereof, " . . . The surface-treated layer is generally preferably uniform and dense, although it may be porous depending upon the usage . . . ", since the oxide or hydroxide of the Si compound and/or the Al compound is precipitated in a comparatively long time so as to uniformly and densely coat the surfaces of the particles, so that the particle surfaces have few polymer adsorption sites, the dispersibility of the particles when dispersed in a resin is insufficient.

As a method of coating the surfaces of oxide iron particles, a method of uniformly coating the surfaces with a precipitate in a considerably long time is generally adopted, as described in Japanese Patent Publication (KOKOKU) No. 54-7292 (1979), " . . . gradually added. After addition, the resultant mixture was further stirred for 30 minutes . . . ", and in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) Nos. 51-47923 (1976) and 51-66320 (1976), " . . . after neutralization, the resultant solution was stirred for one hour . . . . "

The present inventors investigated a method of increasing the thickness of a polymer adsorption layer by increasing the number of polymer adsorption sites on the surfaces of the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles as much as possible.

The present inventors considered that it is necessary to chemically adsorb as large an amount of ultra-fine particles of an oxide or a hydroxide of Al or Si or both Al and Si as possible on the surfaces of the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles. It was possible to densely adhere the ultra-fine particles of an oxide or a hydroxide of Al or Si or both Al and Si on the surfaces of the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles due to the mechanochemical effect produced by uniformly precipitating the ultra-fine particles of an oxide or a hydroxide of Al or Si or both Al and Si in the suspension containing the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles, uniformly mixing the ultra-fine particles with the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles, and compacting the solid substances. As a result, the parameter α in the α-Fe₂ O₃ particles increased to not less than 0.50, preferably 0.50 to 0.70. It is considered due to the increase in the polymer adsorption sites on the particle surfaces.

It has, also, been found that when an oxide or hydroxide of Al or Si or both Al and Si is adhered to the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles, the conformity with a binder resin is greatly enhanced and the dispersibility of the particles in the coating film composition composed of the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles coated with the Al compound and/or Si compound and the binder resin is excellent, and that when the coating film composition is applied to a base film, the mechanical orientation on the base film is smoothly conducted, so that the non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium obtained has an excellent surface smoothness and a high strength.

As a result of further studies, it has been found that when the average major axial diameter of the coated (mechanochemical-treated) acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles is 0.05 to 0.25 μm, the minor axial diameter thereof is 0.010 to 0.035 μm, the particle size distribution thereof in geometrical standard deviation is not more than 1.40, and the aspect ratio thereof is 2 to 20, the non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium has a more excellent surface smoothness and a higher strength.

This is considered to be because by adhering an oxide or hydroxide of Al or Si or both Al and Si to the surfaces of the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles, the conformity of the particles with the binder resin is improved and the dispersibility is thereby improved.

Although Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (KOKAI) No. 62-295217 (1987) discloses a magnetic recording medium with a magnetic layer containing α-Fe₂ O₃ particles coated with a compound containing at least one selected from the group consisting of Si, Cr and Al, in this case, not only the enhancement of the recording density is impaired but also the reduction in the thickness of the magnetic layer becomes difficult similar to the case of adding non-magnetic carbon black. Therefore, the magnetization depth from the surface of the magnetic tape is reduced and the reduction in the thickness of the magnetic tape is conducted insufficiently, as described above.

On the other hand, the non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, containing granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles, for example, granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ fine-particles, surface-treated granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ fine-particles and coated (mechanochemical-treated) granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ fine-particles used in the present invention shows the surface smoothness and the strength, and has vibration proofness. It is, therefore, possible to produce a thin magnetic recording layer having an excellent surface smoothness and a uniform thickness by applying a coating film composition containing magnetic particles and a binder to the surface of the non-magnetic undercoating layer so as to produce a magnetic recording medium, and the magnetic tape obtained has an excellent strength and vibration proofness due to the non-magnetic undercoating layer having a high strength and vibration proofness. As a result, the parameter α in the granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles increased to not less than 0.50, preferably 0.50 to 0.70. It is considered due to the increase in the polymer adsorption sites on the particle surfaces.

The reason why the magnetic recording medium having a non-magnetic undercoating layer of the present invention has vibration proofness, is considered by the present inventors as follows. BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles are granular fine particles having an average particle diameter of not more than 0.1 μm and a uniform particle size. In addition, since the compressed density of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles is 2.0 to 3.0 g/cm³, preferably about 2.38 g/cm³, which is larger than the compaction density 1.78 g/cm³ of titanium oxide which is typical of the non-magnetic particles for an undercoating layer, the packing property of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles is good, so that the packing amount of the particles in the non-magnetic undercoating layer is larger than that of other non-magnetic particles.

In the non-magnetic undercoating layer containing the coated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles of the present invention, the gloss (at 45°) is not less than 170%, preferably not less than 175%, the surface roughness (Ra) is not more than 16 nm, preferably not more than 14 nm, and the Young's modulus (relative value) is not less than 100, preferably not less than 110.

In the non-magnetic undercoating layer containing the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles of the present invention, the gloss (at 45°) is not less than 138%, preferably not less than 140%, the surface roughness (Ra) is not more than 19 nm, preferably not more than 18 nm, and the Young's modulus (relative value) is not less than 90, preferably not less than 100.

The magnetic recording medium (magnetic tape) using as magnetic particles the magnetic metal particles of the present invention has a coercive force of 1400 to 2300 Oe, preferably 1500 to 2300 Oe, a squareness of not less than 0.87, preferably not less than 0.88, a gloss (at 45°) of not less than 188%, preferably not less than 195%, a surface roughness (Ra) of not more than 11 nm, preferably not more than 8 nm, and a Young's modulus (relative value) of not less than 110, preferably not less than 120.

The magnetic recording medium (magnetic tape) using as magnetic particles the Co-doped iron oxide particles of the present invention has a coercive force of 500 to 1500 Oe, preferably 600 to 1000 Oe, a squareness of not less than 0.86, preferably not less than 0.89, a gloss (at 45°) of not less than 145%, preferably not less than 150%, a surface roughness (Ra) of not more than 12.5 nm, preferably not more than 10.5 nm, and a Young's modulus (relative value) of not less than 116, preferably not less than 120.

The magnetic recording medium (magnetic tape) using as magnetic particles the Ba ferrite particles of the present invention has a coercive force of 600 to 1800 Oe, preferably 650 to 1600 Oe, a squareness of not less than 0.77, preferably not less than 0.80, a gloss (at 45°) of not less than 175%, preferably not less than 185%, and a surface roughness (Ra) of not more than 11.0 nm, preferably not more than 10 nm.

The magnetic recording medium (magnetic tape) of the present invention also has either of the following properties:

(1) the linear absorption coefficient is not less than 1.17 μm⁻¹, preferably not less than 1.20 μm⁻¹ ;

(2) the signal recording property (output at 10 MHz) is not less than +0.5 dB, preferably +1 to +6 dB; and

(3) the dispersion in the envelope is 0.1 to 0.5 dB, preferably 0.1 to 0.3 dB (in case of using BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles).

Since acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles in which the parameter α is as large as not less than 0.50 and which has an excellent dispersibility by adhering an oxide or a hydroxide of Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surfaces of the particles are used in the non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium of the present invention, as shown in later-described examples, the non-magnetic undercoating layer is excellent in the strength and the surface smoothness. When the non-magnetic undercoating layer is formed into a magnetic recording medium by applying the magnetic coating composition composed of magnetic particles and a binder resin on the surface thereof, a thin magnetic recording layer having a small light transmittance, an excellent surface smoothness and a uniform thickness is obtained.

The non-magnetic undercoating layer for a magnetic recording medium, containing the granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles of the present invention is excellent in the surface smoothness and the strength and has a vibration proofness, as shown in later-described examples. When the non-magnetic undercoating layer is formed into a magnetic recording medium, it is, therefore, possible to produce a thin magnetic recording layer having an excellent surface smoothness, a uniform thickness, and a high strength and vibration proofness.

EXAMPLES

The present invention will now be described in more detail with reference to the following examples and comparative examples, but the present invention is not restricted to those examples and various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention.

The properties in the examples were measured by the following methods.

The dispersibility was evaluated by the molecular-weight-dependent parameter α in the formula:

    As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α

The closer the parameter α to 1, the more excellent the dispersibility. In the present invention, it is necessary that α≧0.5.

Binder solutions of not less than three kinds, preferably 5 to 6 kinds having different resin concentrations within the range of 0.01 to 5% were obtained by adding and dissolving resin binders having different molecular weight, that is, (i) an urethane resin having a number-average molecular weight of 15,000 and having sulfonate group, (ii) an urethane resin having a number-average molecular weight of 28,000 and having sulfonate group, and (iii) an urethane resin having a number-average molecular weight of 42,000 and having sulfonate group into a mixed solvent of methyl ethyl ketone, toluene and cyclohexane (weight ratio: 5:3:2), respectively.

A resin concentration of each binder solution prepared was measured by a weight method and was assumed to be an initial resin concentration Ci.

To 56 g of each binder resin prepared, 20 g of nonmagnetic particles were added and resultant solution was uniformly dispersed to form a nonmagnetic coating composition until an adsorbed resin concentration on the surface of the nonmagnetic particles and a resin concentration in the binder solution were attained to equilibrium. The obtained nonmagnetic coating composition was subjected to centrifugal separation at a rate of 10,000 rpm for 25 minutes by using a centrifugal separator (manufactured by Kokusan Enshinki Kabushiki Kaisha). After attaining equilibrium state between a supernatant liquid and a precipitated substance, the precipitated substance was removed therefrom and an equilibrated binder concentration C of the obtained supernatant liquid was determined by a weight method.

The difference obtained by subtracting the binder concentration C of the supernatant liquid from the initial resin concentration Ci is assumed to be an apparent resin-adsorption amount A of the nonmagnetic particles.

The binder concentration C and the apparent resin-adsorption amount A of the each binder solution having different concentration were measured by the same method described above.

The obtained values were plotted in a graph of an ordinate of the ratio (C/A) of the binder concentration C to the apparent resin adsorption amount A and an abscissa of the binder concentration C, thereby obtaining a linear relationship therebetween.

The inclination of the obtained straight-line in the graph corresponds to 1/As in the following Langmuir induction formula.

    C/A=(1/As)×C+(1/As·K.sub.2)

C: Equilibrated binder concentration of the supernatant liquid

A: Apparent resin-adsorption amount

As: Saturation adsorption amount

K₂ : Constant

Accordingly, the saturation adsorption amount As was obtained from the above-mentioned Langmuir induction formula.

The saturation adsorption amount As and the molecular weight M of the binder were plotted in a log-log table so as to obtain the linear relationship between As and M. The molecular weight-dependent parameter α was obtained from the inclination of the straight line.

The average major axial diameter, the average minor axial diameter and the aspect ratio of the particles in each of the following examples and comparative examples are expressed by the average values measured in electron microphotographs.

The particle size distribution of the particles is expressed by the geometrical standard deviation (σg) obtained by the following method. The major axial diameters of 350 particles in an electron microphotograph (×120,000 magnification) were measured. The actual major axial diameters and the number of the particles were obtained from the calculation on the basis of the measured values. In logarithmico-normal probability paper, the major axial diameters were plotted at regular intervals on the abscissa-axis and the accumulative number of particles belonging to each interval of the major axial diameters was plotted by percentage on the ordinate-axis by a statistical technique. The major axial diameters corresponding to the number of particles of 50% and 84.13%, respectively, were read from the graph, and the geometrical standard deviation (σg) was measured from the following formula:

    Geometrical standard deviation (σg)=major axial diameter (μm) corresponding to the number of particles of 50% major axial diameter (μm) corresponding to the number of particles of 84.13%

The specific surface area is expressed by the value measured by a BET method.

The amount of each element of the compound of such as Al, Si, Zn, Mg, P, Zr, Ti and Sb with which the acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles are coated was measured from fluorescent X-ray analysis.

The dispersibility was evaluated by the parameter α. Binders having different molecular weights (M=15000, 28000, 42000) were used, and the parameter α was obtained by measuring the saturation adsorption (As) particles to each of the binders. The (As)s and (M)s are plotted in the respective logarithm tables so as to obtain a linear relationship. The parameter α was obtained from the inclination of the line.

The gloss of the coating film was obtained by measuring the gloss at 45° by "Glossmeter UGV-5D, produced by Shimazu Seisakusho Ltd.

The surface roughness (Ra) is expressed by the average value of the center-line average roughness of the coating film by using "Surfcom-575A", manufactured by Tokyo Seimitsu Co., Ltd.

The strength of the coating film was obtained by measuring the Young's modulus by using "Autograph", manufactured by Shimazu Seisakusho Ltd.

The magnetic characteristics were measured by using "Vibration Sample Magnetometer VSM-3S-15", manufactured by Toei Kogyo Co., Ltd. and applying an external magnetic field up to 10 kOe.

The light transmittance of a magnetic sheet is expressed by the linear adsorption coefficient measured by using "Photoelectric Spectrophotometer UV-2100", manufactured by Shimazu Seisakusho Ltd. The linear adsorption coefficient is defined by the following formula, and the larger the value, the more difficult it is for the magnetic sheet to transmit light:

    Linear adsorption coefficient (μm.sup.-1)=1 n (1/t)/FT

wherein t: light transmittance at λ=900 nm, and

FT: thickness (μm) of the coating film the film used for the measurement.

If the linear adsorption coefficient is not less than 1.2 (film thickness: 4.0 μm), it satisfies the light transmittance of not more than 0.8% determined by the VHS standard.

The amount of dehydrated condensate of a coupling agent is expressed by the C content measured by "Carbon/Sulfur Analyser EMIA-2200" (manufactured by Kabushiki Kaisha Horiba Seisakusho).

The vibration proofness is expressed by the dispersion in the envelope.

The signal recording property is expressed by a relative value. The magnetic tape produced was slit into a width of 1/2 inch and mounted on Drum Tester BX-3168 (manufactured by BELDEX Co., Ltd.). The signal recording output at a frequency of 10 MHz at a relative speed of the magnetic tape and the head of 5.8 m/s is expressed by a relative value on the basis of the output of a magnetic tape having the undercoating layer using known non-magnetic particles as a reference tape.

The output waveform of the signal recording property immediately after the start of measurement was displayed by the attached oscilloscope. The vibration width of the luminescent line was read and this value is expressed as the dispersion in the envelope due to sliding between the magnetic head and the magnetic tape.

The compressed density is expressed by weight (g). A sample (10 g) was charged into a cylinder having a diameter of 1 inch, and a pressure of 1 ton/cm² was applied to the sample. The volume of the compacted sample was obtained and the compaction density is expressed by the weight (g) per cm³.

<Production of coated acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ >

Examples 1 to 8 Comparative Examples 1 to 7 Example 1

10 kg of acicular α-FeOOH particles (average major axial diameter: 0.20 μm, average minor axial diameter: 0.019 μm, aspect ratio: 10.5, BET specific surface area: 134.4 m² /g) were charged into an one end open-type retort, and heated at a temperature of 500° C. for 75 minutes in air and dehydrated while the container was rotated. The particles were further annealed at a temperature of 630° C. for 100 minutes, thereby obtaining acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles.

The thus-obtained acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles had an average major axial diameter of 0.13 μm, an average minor axial diameter of 0.023 μm and an aspect ratio of 5.7.

The acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles were then stirred and mixed in water and then pulverized in a wet process by a line mill-type pulverizer (Homomic Line Mill, manufactured by Tokushuki Kogyo Co., Ltd.), thereby obtaining a suspension containing the acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles.

While the suspension was stirred, an aqueous NaOH solution of 0.1 mol/liter was added to adjust the pH to 10.5. After the mixed suspension was stirred and mixed, 6667 ml (equivalent to 3.00 wt % (calculated as Al) based on the α-Fe₂ O₃ particles) of an aqueous sodium aluminate of 1.0 mol/liter was added to the suspension, and the mixed suspension was stirred. While stirring the mixed suspension, an aqueous solution of HCl of 1.0 mol/liter was added so as to adjust the pH to 7.1. The time taken for the adjustment was 5 minutes. The precipitate was immediately filtered out, washed with water and dried by an ordinary method to obtain acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles.

5 kg of the thus-obtained acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles were charged into an edge runner mill "MPUV-Model 2" (Manufactured by Kabushiki Kaisha Matsumoto Chuzo Tekkosho), and compacted and pulverized for 60 minutes at a line load of 60 kg/cm.

The amount of Al adhered to the acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles was 2.99 wt %, and the parameter α was 0.55.

After 4.5 kg of the acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles obtained were mixed with water and stirred again, an aqueous NaOH solution of 0.1 mol/liter was added to adjust the pH to 11.0. Thereafter, 311.4 g (equivalent to 2.00 wt % of the α-Fe₂ O₃ particles calculated as SiO₂) of a water glass #3 solution was added to the solution, and the mixed suspension was stirred. While stirring the mixed suspension, an aqueous solution of HCl of 1.0 mol/liter was added so as to adjust the pH to 7.5. The time taken for the adjustment was 4 minutes. The precipitate was immediately filtered out, washed with water and dried by an ordinary method to obtain acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles.

4 kg of the thus-obtained acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles were charged into an edge runner mill "MPUV-Model 2" (manufactured by Kabushiki Kaisha Matsumoto Chuzo Tekkosho), and compacted and pulverized for 30 minutes at a line load of 60 kg/cm.

The average major axial diameter of the thus-obtained acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles with the Al compound and the Si compound adhered thereto was 0.13 μm, the average minor axial diameter thereof was 0.023 μm, the aspect ratio was 5.7, the particle size distribution in geometrical standard deviation was 1.36, and the BET specific surface area was 59.8 m² /g. The pH of the powder was 7.8, and the parameter α was 0.58.

Examples 2 to 8 and Comparative Examples 1 to 7

Acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles with Al, Si or another compound adhered thereto were produced in the same manner as in Example 1 except for varying the kind of particles to be treated, the temperature and the time for dehydration, the temperature and the time for annealing, the kind and the amount of compound added, the pH of the suspension, the time for adding a solution and stirring the suspension for the purpose of adjusting the pH, the time and the linear load for compaction, the number of times of surface treatments.

In Comparative Example 6, the particles obtained were goethite particles, and in Comparative Example 7 granular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles were obtained by heat-treating magnetite particles.

The main producing conditions and various properties of the products are shown in Tables 1 to 4.

<Production of non-magnetic undercoating layer for magnetic recording medium>

Examples 9 to 16 Comparative Examples 8 to 14 Example 9

The acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles obtained in Example 1 were first mixed with a binder resin and a solvent, so that the solid content was 75 wt %, the obtained mixture was kneaded for 30 minutes by a plasticorder. Thereafter, a predetermined amount of kneaded product was taken out and charged into a glass bottle together with glass beads and a solvent. The resultant mixture was mixed and dispersed for 6 hours by a paint conditioner.

The final composition of the coating film composition obtained was as follows:

    ______________________________________     Acicular α-Fe.sub.2 0.sub.3 particles                            100    parts by weight     Vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate copolymer having a                            10     parts by weight     sodium sulfonate group     Polyurethane having a sodium sulfonate group                            10     parts by weight     Cyclohexanone          40.9   parts by weight     Methyl ethyl ketone    102.2  parts by weight     Toluene                61.3   parts by weight     ______________________________________

The coating film composition obtained was applied to polyethylene terephthalate film having a thickness of 14 μm to a thickness of 45 μm by using an applicator, and dried to obtain a non-magnetic undercoating layer.

The non-magnetic undercoating layer obtained had a gloss of 226%, a surface roughness (Ra) of 8.8 μm and Young's modulus of 125.

Examples 10 to 16 and Comparative Examples 8 to 14

Non-magnetic undercoating layers were produced in the same manner as in Example 9 by using the acicular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles (acicular goethite particles in Comparative Example 6 and granular α-Fe₂ O₃ particles in Comparative Example 7) obtained in Examples 2 to 8 and Comparative Examples 1 to 7.

Various properties of the products are shown in Table 5.

<Production of granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles>

Examples 17 and 18

1.28 mol of Fe(NO₃)₃, 0.182 mol of Ba(OH)₂.8H₂ O and 5.94 mol of NaOH were added to 1400 ml of water in an autoclave, and the obtained mixture was heated to 150° C. The temperature was maintained at 150° C. for 5 hours. The obtained product was washed with water to obtain a slurry with unnecessary salt and alkali removed therefrom. A part of the product was dried at a temperature 80° C. to obtain dried BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

The granular BaO₄.5 Fe₂ O₃ particles obtained had an average particle diameter of 0.022 μm and a BET specific surface area of 79.8 m² /g, as shown in the electron micrograph (×10000) in FIG. 1.

Example 18

4000 ml of an alkali suspension containing 1.20 mol of FeCl₂, 0.15 mol of Ba(OH)₂.8H₂ O, 6.0 mol of NaOH and the balance water was heated to 40° C. The temperature was maintained at 40° C. for 5 hours while blowing air into the suspension at a rate of 250 liter/hour. Fe²⁺ was completely oxidized into Fe³⁺. The obtained product was washed with water to obtain a slurry with unnecessary salt and alkali removed therefrom. A part of the washed product was dried at 80° C. to produce BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

The granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles obtained had an average particle diameter of 0.040 μm and a BET specific surface area of 50.1 m² /g.

<Surface treatment of granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles>

Examples 19 to 38 Example 19

30 g (equivalent to 18.84 wt % as Al₂ O₃, 3.0 wt % (calculated as Al) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles) of an aqueous sodium aluminate was added to the slurry (equivalent to 100 g as BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles) of granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles obtained in Example 17, and the mixed suspension was stirred. HCl was then added to the suspension so as to adjust the pH to 7.0. The obtained mixture was stirred for 30 minutes to coat the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles with the hydroxide of aluminum.

After the resultant mixture was stirred, it was filtered, washed with water and dried by an ordinary method. Thereafter, the obtained product was compacted by an edge runner mill (Sandmill: manufactured by Kabushiki Kaisha Matsumoto Chuzo Tekkosho).

The average particle diameter of the thus-obtained granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles coated with the hydroxide of aluminum was 0.023 μm and the BET specific surface area was 79.5 m² /g.

Examples 20 to 30

Surface-treated granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles were produced in the same manner as in Example 19 except for varying the kind of BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles, the kinds of aluminum compound and other compounds, the amount thereof adhered to the particles, the pH of the suspension, the kind of coupling agent, the surface-treating method and the amount of coupling agent adhered to the particles as shown in Table 6.

Various properties of the surface-treated granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles obtained are shown in Table 6.

<Production of coated granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles>

Examples 31 to 38 Example 31

The granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles obtained in Example 17 were then stirred and mixed in water and then pulverized in a wet process by a line mill-type pulverizer (Homomic Line Mill, manufactured by Tokushuki Kogyo Co., Ltd.), thereby obtaining a suspension containing the granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

While the suspension was stirred, an aqueous NaOH solution of 0.1 mol/liter was added to adjust the pH to 11.0. After the mixed suspension was stirred and mixed, 8889 ml (equivalent to 4.00 wt % (calculated as Al) based on the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles) of an aqueous sodium aluminate of 1.0 mol/liter was added to the suspension, and the mixed suspension was stirred. While stirring the mixed suspension, an aqueous solution of HCl of 1.0 mol/liter was added so as to adjust the pH to 7.0. The time taken for the adjustment was 5 minutes. The precipitate was immediately filtered out, washed with water and dried by an ordinary method to obtain granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

5 kg of the thus-obtained granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles were charged into an edge runner mill "MPUV-Model 2" (Manufactured by Kabushiki Kaisha Matsumoto Chuzo Tekkosho), and compacted and pulverized for 60 minutes at a line load of 75 kg/cm.

The amount of Al adhered to the granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles was 4.00 wt %, and the parameter α was 0.53.

After 4.5 kg of the granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles obtained were mixed with water and stirred again, an aqueous NaOH solution of 0.1 mol/liter was added to adjust the pH to 10.6. Thereafter, 778.5 g (equivalent to 5.00 wt % of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles calculated as SiO₂) of a water glass #3 solution was added to the solution, and the mixed suspension was stirred. While stirring the mixed suspension, an aqueous solution of HCl of 1.0 mol/liter was added so as to adjust the pH to 7.9. The time taken for the adjustment was 5 minutes. The precipitate was immediately filtered out, washed with water and dried by an ordinary method to obtain granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.

4 kg of the thus-obtained granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles were charged into an edge runner mill "MPUV-Model 2" (manufactured by Kabushiki Kaisha Matsumoto Chuzo Tekkosho), and compacted and pulverized for 30 minutes at a line load of 75 kg/cm.

The average particle diameter of the thus-obtained granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles with the Al compound and the Si compound adhered thereto was 0.023 μm, and the BET specific surface area was 80.3 m² /g. The parameter α was 0.58.

Examples 32 to 38

Granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles with Al, Si or another compound adhered thereto were produced in the same manner as in Example 31 except for varying the kind of particles to be treated, the kind and the amount of compound added, the pH of the suspension, the time for adding a solution and stirring the suspension for the purpose of adjusting the pH, the time and the linear load for compaction, the number of times of surface treatments.

The main producing conditions and various properties of the products are shown in Tables 7 to 8.

<Production of non-magnetic undercoating layer for magnetic recording medium>

Examples 39 to 60 Comparative Examples 23 to 30 Example 39

The granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles obtained in Example 17 were mixed with a binder resin and a solvent so that the solid content was 75 wt %, an the obtained mixture was kneaded for 30 minutes by a plasticoder. Thereafter, a predetermined amount of kneaded product was taken out and charged into a glass bottle together with glass beads and a solvent. The resultant mixture was mixed and dispersed for 6 hours by a paint conditioner.

The final composition of the coating film composition obtained was as follows:

    ______________________________________     Granular BaO · 4.5Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 particles                            100    parts by weight     Vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate copolymer having a                            10     parts by weight     sodium sulfonate group     Polyurethane having a sodium sulfonate group                            10     parts by weight     Cyclohexanone          40.9   parts by weight     Methyl ethyl ketone    102.2  parts by weight     Toluene                61.3   parts by weight     ______________________________________

The coating film composition obtained was applied to polyethylene terephthalate film having a thickness of 14 μm to a thickness of 55 μm by using an applicator, and dried to obtain a non-magnetic undercoating layer. The thickness of the non-magnetic undercoating layer was 3.6 μm.

The non-magnetic undercoating layer obtained had a Young's modulus of 101, a gloss of 152% and a surface roughness (Ra) of 15.6 nm.

Examples 40 to 60 and Comparative Examples 23 to 30

Non-magnetic undercoating layers for a magnetic recording medium were produced in the same manner as in Example 39 by using the granular BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles obtained in Examples 40 to 60 and the non-magnetic particles shown in Table 9 for comparison (Comparative Examples 15 to 22).

Various properties of the products are shown in Tables 10 and 12.

21 Production of magnetic tape>

Examples 61 to 95 Comparative Examples 31 to 40 Example 61

Co-coated magnetic iron oxide particles (average major axial diameter: 0.19 μm, average minor axial diameter: 0.026 μm, Hc: 912 Oe, σs: 80.0 emu/g) obtained in Example 9 were first mixed as magnetic particles with a binder resin and a solvent, so that the solid content was 76 wt %, the obtained mixture was kneaded for 30 minutes by a plasticoder. Thereafter, a predetermined amount of kneaded product was taken out and charged into a glass bottle together with glass beads and a solvent. The resultant mixture was mixed and dispersed for 6 hours by a paint conditioner. Thereafter, a polishing agent, a lubricant and a curing agent were added, and the obtained mixture was further mixed and dispersed for 15 minutes. The composition of the coating material obtained was as follows:

    ______________________________________     Co-coated magnetic iron oxide particles                            100    parts by weight     Vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate copolymer having a                            10     parts by weight     sodium sulfonate group     Polyurethane having a sodium sulfonate group                            10     parts by weight     Polishing agent        10     parts by weight     Lubricant              2.5    parts by weight     Curing agent           5      parts by weight     Cyclohexanone          52.2   parts by weight     Methyl ethyl ketone    130.5  parts by weight     Toluene                78.3   parts by weight     ______________________________________

The coating material obtained was applied to the non-magnetic undercoating layer obtained in Example 9 to a thickness of 15 μm by using an applicator and dried to obtain a sheet-like sample.

The sheet-like sample was calendered, and cured at a temperature of 60° C. for 24 hours. The sheet-like sample was then slit to a width of 0.5 inch to obtain a magnetic tape.

The magnetic recording layer of the magnetic tape obtained had a thickness if 1.3 μm. The magnetic tape had a coercive force (Hc) of 951 Oe, a squareness of 0.90, a gloss of 185%, a surface roughness (Ra) of 5.6 nm, a Young's modulus of 135, and a linear adsorption coefficient of 1.24.

Examples 62 to 66 Comparative Examples 31 to 34

Magnetic recording media were produced in the same manner as in Example 61 by using the non-magnetic undercoating layers for a magnetic recording medium obtained in Examples 9, 11 and 14 and Comparative Examples 8 and 13.

Various properties of the products are shown in Table 13.

Example 67

A magnetic tape was produced in the same manner as in Example 67 except for using metal magnetic particles (average major axial diameter: 0.12 μm, average minor axial diameter: 0.015 μm, aspect ratio: 8, Hc: 1610 Oe, σs: 118.2 emu/g, BET specific surface area: 55.3 m² /g), using the non-magnetic undercoating layer obtained in Example 39.

The magnetic tape obtained had a coercive force (Hc) of 1680 Oe, a squareness of 0.88, a gloss of 198%, a surface roughness (Ra) of 8.0 nm, a signal recording property of +1.0 dB, and a vibration proofness of Δ0.3 dB,

Examples 68 to 95, Comparative Examples 35 to 40

Magnetic tapes were produced in the same manner as in Example 55 except for varying the kind of non-magnetic undercoating layer and the kind of magnetic particles used for the magnetic recording layer.

Various properties of the products are shown in Tables 14 and 16.

                                      TABLE 1     __________________________________________________________________________     Production of acicular α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 particles     Acicular goethite particles           Properties of α-Fe.sub.2                                           O.sub.3 particies     Examples           BET                              BET     and  Major               Minor    specific                            Dehydration                                   Annealing                                           Major                                                Minor    specific     Compara-          axial               axial                    Aspect                        surface                            Tempe- Tempera-                                           axial                                                axial                                                     Aspect                                                         surface     tive diameter               diameter                    ratio                        area                            rature                                Time                                   ture Time                                           diameter                                                diameter                                                     ratio                                                         area     Examples          (μm)               (μm)                    (-) (m.sup.2 /g)                            (°C.)                                (min)                                   (°C.)                                        (min)                                           (μm)                                                (μm)                                                     (-) (m.sup.2 /g)     __________________________________________________________________________     Ex. 1          0.20 0.019                    10.5                        134.4                            500 75 630  100                                           0.13 0.023                                                     5.7 --     Ex. 2          0.20 0.019                    10.5                        134.4                            500 75 630  100                                           0.13 0.022                                                     5.9 --     Ex. 3          0.20 0.019                    10.5                        134.4                            500 75 630  100                                           0.14 0.023                                                     6.1 --     Ex. 4          0.20 0.019                    10.5                        134.4                            500 75 630  100                                           0.14 0.023                                                     6.1 --     Ex. 5          0.20 0.019                    10.5                        134.4                            500 75 630  100                                           0.13 0.022                                                     5.9 --     Ex. 6          0.22 0.022                    10.0                        84.5                            450 45 650  150                                           0.16 0.028                                                     5.7 --     Ex. 7          0.22 0.022                    10.0                        84.5                            450 45 650  150                                           0.17 0.028                                                     6.1 --     Ex. 8          0.25 0.024                    10.4                        70.3                            480 60 650  120                                           0.24 0.034                                                     7.1 --     Comp.          0.20 0.019                    10.5                        134.4                            500 75 630  100                                           0.13 0.020                                                     6.5 --     Ex. 1     Comp.          0.20 0.019                    10.5                        134.4                            500 75 630  100                                           0.14 0.022                                                     6.4 --     Ex. 2     Comp.          0.20 0.019                    10.5                        134.4                            500 75 630  100                                           0.13 0.021                                                     6.2 --     Ex. 3     Comp.          0.22 0.022                    10.0                        84.5                            450 45 650  150                                           0.16 0.028                                                     5.7 --     Ex. 4     Comp.          0.25 0.024                    10.4                        70.3                            480 60 650  120                                           0.25 0.035                                                     7.1 --     Ex. 5     Comp.          0.20 0.019                    10.5                        134.4                            --  -- --   -- --   --   --  --     Ex. 6     Comp.          --   --   --  --  --  -- --   -- *0.17                                                0.12 1.4 13.8     Ex. 7     __________________________________________________________________________      (Note)      *: Granular Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 particles obtained by firing magnetite      particles were used.

                                      TABLE 2     __________________________________________________________________________                                      Production of                                      adhered acicu-                                      lar α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3     Production of adhered acicular α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3                                      particles     Production of mixture of α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3                                      (First     particles and hydroxide          Treatment)          pH before           pH after                                  Adjust-                                      Compaction          adjust-    Calcu-                         Amount                              adjust-                                  ing Linear          ment       lated                         added                              ment                                  time                                      load                                          Time     Examples          (-)  Kind  as  (wt %)                              (-) (min)                                      (kg/cm)                                          (min)     __________________________________________________________________________     Ex. 1          10.5 Sodium                     Al  3.00 7.1 5   60  60               aluminate     Ex. 2          10.8 Sodium                     Al  5.00 7.2 7   60  60               aluminate               Water glass               #3    SiO.sub.2                         4.50     Ex. 3          11.0 Water glass                     SiO.sub.2                         0.50 6.8 3   60  60               #3     Ex. 4          10.7 Aluminum                     Al  1.50 7.0 6   45  45               sulfate               zirconium                     Zr  3.00               sulfate     Ex. 5          11.0 Sodium                     Al  1.00 7.5 5   60  60               aluminate               Zinc sulfate                     Zn  2.00     Ex. 6          10.4 Aluminum                     Al  2.50 7.0 7   60  60               sulfate               Water glass                     SiO.sub.2                         2.50               #3     Ex. 7          10.5 Water glass                     SiO.sub.2                         5.00 6.5 5   45  30               #3               hexametha-                     P   1.00               phophate     Ex. 8     Water glass                     SiO.sub.2                         15.00                              6.5 8   75  60               #3               Antimony                     Sb  3.00               sulfate     __________________________________________________________________________     Ex-        Production of adhered acicular α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 particles     am-        (First Treatment)     ples        Properties of α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 particles                Major                     Minor    Geometrical                                    BET   Para-        Calcu-            Amount                axial                     axial                          Aspect                              standard                                    specific                                          meter        lated            adhered                diameter                     diameter                          ratio                              deviation                                    surface area                                          α        as  (wt %)                (μm)                     (μm)                          (-) σg                                    (m.sup.2 /g)                                          (-)     __________________________________________________________________________     Ex. 1        Al  2.99                --   --   --  --    --    0.55     Ex. 2        Al  5.01                0.13 0.023                          5.7 1.36  58.8  0.58        SiO.sub.2            4.46     Ex. 3        SiO.sub.2            0.48                --   --   --  --    --    0.51     Ex. 4        Al  1.50                0.14 0.023                          6.1 1.35  58.8  0.55        Zr  3.01     Ex. 5        Al  0.99                --   --   --  --    --    0.55        Zn  1.98     Ex. 6        Al  2.50                --   --   --  --    --    0.57        SiO.sub.2            2.38     Ex. 7        SiO.sub.2            4.78                --   --   --  --    --    0.52        P   0.92     Ex. 8        SiO.sub.2            13.86                0.24 0.034                          7.1 1.30  42.1  0.55        Sb  3.03     __________________________________________________________________________

                                      TABLE 3     __________________________________________________________________________     Production of adhered acicular α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 particles     (Second Treatment)     Production of mixture of α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3     particles and hydroxide     pH before                pH after                                  Adjust-                                      Compaction          adjust-    Calcu-                         Amount                              adjust-                                  ing Linear          ment       lated                         added                              ment                                  time                                      load                                          Time     Examples          (-)  Kind  as  (wt %)                              (-) (min)                                      (kg/cm)                                          (min)     __________________________________________________________________________     Ex. 1          11.0 Water glass                     SiO.sub.2                         2.00 7.5 4   60  30               #3     Ex. 3          12.3 Aluminum                     Al  8.00 7.0 6   60  60               acetate     Ex. 5          12.8 Colloidal                     SiO.sub.2                         0.50 6.8 7   45  45               silica               Titanyl                     Ti  1.50               sulfate     Ex. 6          12.0 Aluminum                     Al  2.50 7.1 6   60  60               sulfate               Water glass                     SiO.sub.2                         2.50               #3     Ex. 7          11.5 Sodium                     Al  1.00 7.0 5   30  30               aluminate               Magnesium                     Mg  1.00               sulfate     __________________________________________________________________________     Production of adhered acicular α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 particles     (Second Treatment)     Properties of α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 particles                Major                     Minor    Geometrical                                    BET   Para-     Ex-        Calcu-            Amount                axial                     axial                          Aspect                              standard                                    specific                                          meter     am-        lated            adhered                diameter                     diameter                          ratio                              deviation                                    surface area                                          α     ples        as  (wt %)                (μm)                     (μm)                          (-) σg                                    (m.sup.2 /g)                                          (-)     __________________________________________________________________________     Ex. 1        SiO.sub.2            1.87                0.13 0.023                          5.7 1.36  59.8  0.58     Ex. 3        Al  7.86                0.13 0.023                          5.7 1.36  58.6  0.61     Ex. 5        SiO.sub.2            0.48                0.13 0.022                          5.9 1.36  58.8  0.57        Ti  1.48     Ex. 6        Al  2.47                0.16 0.028                          5.7 1.33  45.6  0.60        SiO.sub.2            2.28     Ex. 7        Al  0.99                0.17 0.028                          6.1 1.32  47.1  0.55        Mg  0.86     __________________________________________________________________________

                                      TABLE 4     __________________________________________________________________________     Production of adhered acicular α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 particles     (First Treatment)     Production of mixture of α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3     particles and hydroxide     pH before                 pH after Compaction     Compara-          adjust-         Amount                               adjust-                                   Adjusting                                        Linear     tive ment       Calculated                          added                               ment                                   time load                                            Time     Examples          (-)  Kind  as   (wt %)                               (-) (min)                                        (kg/cm)                                            (min)     __________________________________________________________________________     Comp.          --   --    --   --   --  --   --  --     Ex. 1     Comp.          --   --    --   --   --  --   60  60     Ex. 2     Comp.          11.8 Sodium                     Al   0.50 7.1 60   --  --     Ex. 3     aluminate     Comp.          --   --    --   --   --  --   30  30     Ex. 4     Comp.          --   --    --   --   --  --   --  --     Ex. 5     Comp.          --   --    --   --   --  --   --  --     Ex. 6     Comp.          --   --    --   --   --  --   --  --     Ex. 7     __________________________________________________________________________     Production of adhered acicular α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 particles     (First Treatment)     Properties of α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 particles     Compara-     Major                       Minor    Geometrical                                      BET   Para-     tive Calcu-              Amount                  axial                       axial                            Aspect                                standard                                      specific                                            meter     Exam-          lated              adhered                  diameter                       diameter                            ratio                                deviation                                      surface area                                            α     ples as  (wt %)                  (μm)                       (μm)                            (-) σg                                      (m.sup.2 /g)                                            (-)     __________________________________________________________________________     Comp.          --  --  0.13 0.021                            6.2 1.36  59.3  0.29     Ex. 1     Comp.          --  --  0.13 0.022                            5.9 1.37  58.9  0.31     Ex. 2     Comp.          Al  0.50                  0.13 0.022                            5.9 1.36  57.9  0.42     Ex. 3     Comp.          --  --  0.25 0.035                            5.7 1.33  44.1  0.32     Ex. 4     Comp.          --  --  0.25 0.035                            7.1 1.31  40.6  0.32     Ex. 5     Comp.          --  --  0.20 0.019                            10.1                                1.32  134.4 0.28     Ex. 6     Comp.          --  --  0.17 0.12 1.4 1.56  13.4  0.30     Ex. 7     __________________________________________________________________________      Note: Goethite particles in Comp. 6 and granular Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3      particles in Comp. 7.

                  TABLE 5     ______________________________________     Properties of non-magnetic undercoat layer                                     Young's     Examples                 Surface                                     modulus     and     Kind of          roughness                                     (relative     Compara-             Non-             of coating                                     value) of                                            Thickness     tive    magnetic Gloss   film   coating                                            of coating     Examples             particles                      45° (%)                              Ra (nm)                                     film (-)                                            film (μm)     ______________________________________     Ex. 9   Ex. 1    226     8.8    125    3.3     Ex. 10  Ex. 2    212     9.2    126    3.5     Ex. 11  Ex. 3    218     9.2    120    3.4     Ex. 12  Ex. 4    206     9.6    118    3.2     Ex. 13  Ex. 5    199     10.0   125    3.1     Ex. 14  Ex. 6    193     11.8   138    3.3     Ex. 15  Ex. 7    181     12.6   140    3.1     Ex. 16  Ex. 8    176     13.8   146    3.5     Comp.   Comp.    142     22.8   85     3.5     Ex. 8   Ex. 1     Comp.   Comp.    148     20.8   90     3.5     Ex. 9   Ex. 2     Comp.   Comp.     Ex. 10  Ex. 3    165     16.6   98     3.3     Comp.   Comp.    132     24.5   95     3.3     Ex. 11  Ex. 4     Comp.   Comp.    136     23.8   98     3.6     Ex. 12  Ex. 5     Comp.   Comp.     86     33.6   82     3.4     Ex. 13  Ex. 6     Comp.   Comp.     90     42.0   60     3.3     Ex. 14  Ex. 7     ______________________________________

                                      TABLE 6     __________________________________________________________________________                                                          Adhered granular     Granular                                             BaO.4.5Fe.sub.2                                                          O.sub.3     BaO.4.5Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3                              particles               BET Coating with Al or                          BET     Average   specific                   another metal compound                                Coating with coupling agent                                                          Average                                                               specific          particle               surface  pH of                            Amount                    Amount                                                          particle                                                               surface          diameter               area     suspen-                            adhered              pH of                                                      adhered                                                          diameter                                                               area     Examples          (μm)               (m.sup.2 /g)                   Kind sion                            (wt %)                                Kind             suspension                                                      (wt %)                                                          (μm)                                                               (m.sup.2     __________________________________________________________________________                                                               /g)     Ex. 17          0.022               79.8                   --   --  --  --               --   --  0.022                                                               79.8     Ex. 18          0.040               50.1                   --   --  --  --               --   --  0.040                                                               50.1     Ex. 19          0.022               79.8                   Sodium                        7.0 2.98                                --               --   --  0.023                                                               79.5                   aluminate     Ex. 20          0.022               79.8                   Aluminum                        7.0 0.50                                --               --   --  0.023                                                               80.0                   sulfate     Ex. 21          0.040               50.1                   Aluminum                        7.0 9.95                                --               --   --  0.040                                                               49.5                   sulfate     Ex. 22          0.022               79.8                   Aluminum                        8.0 4.99                                --               --   --  0.024                                                               80.1                   sulfate                   Water                        7.0 3.00                   glass #3     Ex. 23          0.022               79.8                   Aluminum                        7.5 3.01                                --               --   --  0.023                                                               79.6                   sulfate                   Zirconium                        8.0 2.97                   sulfate     Ex. 24          0.040               50.1                   Aluminum                        6.8 1.00                                --               --   --  0.040                                                               49.0                   sulfate                   Zinc 8.0 5.03                   chloride     Ex. 25          0.022               79.8                   Sodium                        7.5 5.03                                γ-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane                                                 Dry  3.0 0.022                                                               74.2                   aluminate    (A-1100:produced by Nippon Unicar                                                 process                                co., Ltd.)     Ex. 26          0.022               79.8                   Sodium                        8.3 2.99                                Isopropyltri(N-aminoethyl-aminoethyl)                                                 Wet  1.0 0.023                                                               78.6                   aluminate                        titanate                            process                   Water                        6.8 2.01                                (KR-44:produced by Ajinomoto                                                 (water)                   glass #3                        Ltd.)     Ex. 27          0.040               50.1                   Aluminum                        8.0 1.01                                γ-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane                                                 Wet  2.0 0.040                                                               45.1                   sulfate      (A-187:produced by Nippon Unicar                                                 process                   Titanyl                        7.0 1.01                                Co., Ltd.)       (solvent)                   sulfate     Ex. 28          0.022               79.8                   --   --  --  γ-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane                                                 Dry  5.0 0.022                                                               75.0                                (A-1100:produced by Nippon Unicar                                                 process                                Co., Ltd.)     Ex. 29          0.022               79.8                   --   --  --  Acetoalkoxyaluminum diisopropylate                                                 Dry  10.0                                                          0.022                                                               72.1                                (AL-M:produced by Ajinomoto Co.,                                                 process                                Ltd.)     Ex. 30          0.040               50.1                   --   --  --  Isopropyltri(N-aminoethyl-aminoethyl)                                                 Dry  1.0 0.040                                                               48.5                                titanate         process                                (KR-44:produced by Ajinomoto Co.,                                Ltd.)     __________________________________________________________________________

                                      TABLE 7     __________________________________________________________________________     Production of adhered granular BaO.4.5 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3     particles (First Treatment)   Production of coated granular BaO.4.5                                   Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3     Production of mixture of BaO.4.5 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3                                   particles (First Treatment)     particles and hydroxide                  Properties of BaO.4.5     Kind     pH               pH             Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3 particles     of       before           after                                   Adjust-                                       Compaction     Average                                                           BET   Para-     Ex-        Non-  adjust-  Calcu-                           Amount                               adjust-                                   ing Linear Calcu-                                                  Amount                                                      particle                                                           specific                                                                 meter     am-        magnetic              ment     lated                           added                               ment                                   time                                       load                                           Time                                              lated                                                  adhered                                                      diameter                                                           surface                                                                 α     ples        particles              (-) Kind as  (wt %)                               (-) (min.)                                       (kg/cm)                                           (min)                                              as  (wt %)                                                      (μm)                                                           (m.sup.2 /g)                                                                 (-)     __________________________________________________________________________     Ex.        0.022           80.1              11.0                  Sodium                       Al  4.00                               7.0 5   75  60 Al  4.00                                                      --   --    0.53     31           aluminate     Ex.        0.022           80.1              10.8                  Sodium                       Al  2.00                               6.8 5   80  60 Al  2.00                                                      0.022                                                           82.2  0.59     32           aluminate                   SiO.sub.2                                                  2.46                  Water                       SiO.sub.2                           2.50                  glass #3     Ex.        0.022           80.1              10.5                  Water                       SiO.sub.2                           0.50                               7.0 3   60  35 SiO.sub.2                                                  0.49                                                      --   --    0.51     33           glass #3     Ex.        0.022           80.1              11.0                  Sodium                       Al  0.75                               7.5 6   60  60 Al  0.75                                                      0.022                                                           81.0  0.57     34           aluminate                   Zr  0.99                  Zirconium                       Zr  1.00                  sulfate     Ex.        0.022           80.1              10.6                  Aluminum                       Al  1.00                               7.8 5   45  30 Al  1.01                                                      --   --    0.54     35           sulfate     Ex.        0.040           50.3              10.5                  Water                       SiO.sub.2                           2.50                               6.8 8   60  60 SiO.sub.2                                                  2.45                                                      0.041                                                           51.2  0.56     36           glass #3                    Zn  2.48                       Zn  2.50     Ex.        0.040           50.3              11.2                  Water                       SiO.sub.2                           1.00                               7.0 6   75  60 SiO.sub.2                                                  0.97                                                      --   --    0.53     37           glass #3                    P   0.51                       P   0.50     Ex.        0.040           50.3              10.9                  Sodium                       SiO.sub.2                           10.50                               7.5 8   80  60 Al  10.48                                                      0.038                                                           46.9  0.57     38           aluminate                   Ti  2.49                  Titanyl                       Ti  2.50                  sulfate     __________________________________________________________________________

                                      TABLE 8     __________________________________________________________________________     Production of adhered granular BaO.4.5 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3     particles (Second Treatment)    Production of coated garanular BaO.4.5                                     Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3     Production of mixture of BaO.4.5 Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3                                     particles (Second Treatment)     particles and hydroxide                    Properties of BaO.4.5 Fe.sub.2                                                O.sub.3 particles         Kind  pH                pH                          BET         of    before            after                                     Adjust-                                         Compaction     Average                                                             specific                                                                 Para-     Ex- Non-  adjust-   Calcu-                             Amount                                 adjust-                                     ing Linear Calcu-                                                    Amount                                                        particle                                                             surface                                                                 meter     Exam-         magnetic               ment      lated                             added                                 ment                                     time                                         load                                             Time                                                lated                                                    adhered                                                        diameter                                                             area                                                                 α     ples         particles               (-) Kind  as  (wt %)                                 (-) (min.)                                         (kg/cm)                                             (min)                                                as  (wt %)                                                        (μm)                                                             (m.sup.2 /g)                                                                 (-)     __________________________________________________________________________     Ex. 0.022            80.1               10.6                   Water SiO.sub.2                             5.00                                 7.9 5   75  30 SiO2                                                    4.89                                                        0.023                                                             80.3                                                                 0.58     31            glass #3     Ex. 0.022            80.1               11.8                   Sodium                         Al  8.00                                 7.5 6   75  60 Al  8.00                                                        0.023                                                             78.6                                                                 0.61     33            aluminate     Ex. 0.022            80.1               11.5                   Colloidal                         SiO.sub.2                             6.00                                 8.0 8   60  60 SiO.sub.2                                                    5.86                                                        0.022     35            silica                       Mg  2.78                   Mag-  Mg  3.00                   nesium                   sulfate     Ex. 0.040            50.3               11.0                   Water SiO.sub.2                             5.00                                 7.0 6   75  60 SiO.sub.2                                                    4.92                                                        0.040                                                             51.2                                                                 0.55     37            glass #3                     Sb  1.00                   Antimony                         Sb  1.00                   sulfate     __________________________________________________________________________

                  TABLE 9     ______________________________________             Non-magnetic particles                             Average                             particle  BET specific     Comparative             diameter  surface     Examples  Kind          (μm)   area (m.sup.2 /g)     ______________________________________     Comp. Ex. 15               Titanium oxide                             0.030     40.1     Comp. Ex. 16               Titanium oxide                             0.102     17.2     Comp. Ex. 17               Iron oxide (α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3)                             0.052     50.3     Comp. Ex. 18               Iron oxide (α-Fe.sub.2 O.sub.3)                             0.170     10.2     Comp. Ex. 19               Silicon dioxide                             0.020     200.3     Comp. Ex. 20               Alunminum oxide                             0.405     9.7     Comp. Ex. 21               Carbon black  0.022     134.0     Comp. Ex. 22               Carbon black  0.040     56.1     ______________________________________

                  TABLE 10     ______________________________________     Non-magnetic undercoat layer                                        Strength     Kind of               Surface smoothness                                        Young's             non-     Thickness      Surface                                            modulus             magnetic of coating                               Gloss roughness                                            (relative     Examples             particles                      film (μm)                               45° (%)                                     Ra (nm)                                            value)     ______________________________________     Ex. 39  Ex. 17   3.6      152   15.6   101     Ex. 40  Ex. 18   3.5      145   16.8   103     Ex. 41  Ex. 19   3.6      161   14.4   117     Ex. 42  Ex. 20   3.6      155   15.2   109     Ex. 43  Ex. 21   3.8      146   17.2   103     Ex. 44  Ex. 22   3.7      168   12.6   126     Ex. 45  Ex. 23   3.6      159   14.8   118     Ex. 46  Ex. 24   3.5      150   16.8   108     Ex. 47  Ex. 25   3.8      165   13.8   138     Ex. 48  Ex. 26   3.8      172   12.0   138     Ex. 49  Ex. 27   3.9      157   14.2   130     ______________________________________

                  TABLE 11     ______________________________________     Non-magnetic undercoat layer     Examples                             Strength     and     Kind of           Surface smoothness                                          Young's     Compara-             non-     Thickness      Surface                                            modulus     tive    magnetic of coating                               Gloss roughness                                            (relative     Examples             particles                      film (μm)                               45° (%)                                     Ra (nm)                                            value)     ______________________________________     Ex. 50  Ex. 28   3.7      148   16.8   120     Ex. 51  Ex. 29   3.5      155   15.0   126     Ex. 52  Ex. 30   3.5      141   17.4   118     Comp.   Comp.    3.6      137   19.6   89     Ex. 23  Ex. 15     Comp.   Comp.    3.5      103   34.3   85     Ex. 24  Ex. 16     Comp.   Comp.    3.4      132   20.2   85     Ex. 25  Ex. 17     Comp.   Comp.    3.3       91   41.6   83     Ex. 26  Ex. 18     Comp.   Comp.    3.6       62   69.6   32     Ex. 27  Ex. 19     Comp.   Comp.    3.7       78   56.3   78     Ex. 28  Ex. 20     Comp.   Comp.    3.6       60   84.2   72     Ex. 29  Ex. 21     Comp.   Comp.    3.6       35   106.0  40     Ex. 30  Ex. 22     ______________________________________

                  TABLE 12     ______________________________________     Properties of non-magnetic undercoat layer                                     Young's     Examples                 Surface                                     modulus     and     Kind of          roughness                                     (relative     Compara-             Non-             of coating                                     value) of                                            Thickness     tive    magnetic Gloss   film   coating                                            of coating     Examples             particles                      45° (%)                              Ra (nm)                                     film (-)                                            film (μm)     ______________________________________     Ex. 53  Ex. 31   170     12.2   120    3.2     Ex. 54  Ex. 32   172     11.8   118    3.3     Ex. 55  Ex. 33   168     12.4   116    3.2     Ex. 56  Ex. 34   165     14.0   113    3.4     Ex. 57  Ex. 35   168     13.6   108    3.6     Ex. 58  Ex. 36   156     15.8   136    3.1     Ex. 59  Ex. 37   153     16.2   128    3.3     Ex. 60  Ex. 38   148     17.6   138    2.9     ______________________________________

                                      TABLE 13     __________________________________________________________________________     Properties of magnetic tape                                                     Young's                                                Surface                                                     modulus                                                          Thick-                                            Gloss                                                rough-                                                     (relative                                                          ness     Examples                               of  ness value)                                                          of     and  Under-                  Coercive  coating                                                coating                                                     of   magnetic     Compara-          coat                    force                                       Square-                                            film                                                film coating                                                          coating                                                               Linear     tive layer                   Hc   ness 45°                                                Ra   film film absorption     Examples          used              Magnetic particles used                                  (Oe) (-)  (%) (nm) (-)  (μm)                                                               (μm.sup.-1)     __________________________________________________________________________     Ex. 61          Ex. 9              Co-coated Fe.sub.3 O.sub.4 particles                                  951  0.90 185 5.6  135  1.3  1.24     Ex. 62          Ex. 11               major axial diameter                           0.19 μm                                  956  0.90 180 6.0  132  1.3  1.22     Ex. 63          Ex. 14              minor axial diameter                           0.026 μm                                  961  0.90 180 6.2  133  1.3  1.25     Comp.          Comp.              Hc           912 Oe 936  0.85 140 12.6 115  1.2  1.10     Ex. 31          Ex. 8              σs     80.0 emu/g     Comp.          Comp.              Co content   5.36%  929  0.82 116 14.4 104  1.4  1.16     Ex. 32          Ex.13              Fe.sup.2+ content                           15.8%!     Ex. 64          Ex. 9              Magnetic metal particles                                  1836 0.89 246 5.2  132  1.5  1.34     Ex. 65          Ex. 11               Major axial diameter                           0.12 μm                                  1827 0.89 240 5.4  130  1.6  1.31     Ex. 66          Ex. 14              Minor axial diameter                           0.015 μm                                  1830 0.88 240 6.8  130  1.5  1.25     Comp.          Comp.              Hc           1780 Oe                                  1803 0.85 185 17.6 108  1.3  1.16     Ex. 33          Ex. 8              σs     123.8 emu/g     Comp.          Comp.              BET specific surface                           53.4 m.sup.2 /g                                  1790 0.84 146 28.8 93   1.4  1.15     Ex. 34          Ex. 13              area              Co content   5.8%              Al content   1.7%              B content    1.2%!     __________________________________________________________________________

                                      TABLE 14     __________________________________________________________________________              Magnetic recording layer       Magnetic tape                                    Gloss                                        Surface                                             Magnetic     Examples                   Thick-                                    of  roughness                                             characteristic                                                        Vibration proofness     and  Under                 ness of                                    coating                                        coating                                             Coercive   Signal                                                               Dispersion     Compara-          coat                  coating                                    film                                        film force                                                  Squareness                                                        cording                                                               inop-     tive layer                 film                                    45°                                        Ra   (Hc) (Br/Bm)                                                        erty (10                                                               envelope     Examples          used              Magnestic particles used                                (μm)                                    (%) (nm) (Oe) (-)   output)                                                               (dB)     __________________________________________________________________________     Ex. 67          Ex. 39              Magnetic metal particles                                1.3 198   8.0                                             1680 0.88  +1.0   Δ0.3     Ex. 68          Ex. 41               major axial diameter                          0.12 μm                                1.2 215   6.0                                             1696 0.89  +2.6   Δ0.2     Ex. 69          Ex. 44              minor axial diameter                          0.015 μm                                1.2 226   5.6                                             1702 0.89  +2.6   Δ0.2     Ex. 70          Ex. 47              Hc          1610 Oe                                1.2 230   5.0                                             1712 0.90  +2.8   Δ0.2     Ex. 71          Ex. 50              σs    118.2 emu/g                                1.3 202   6.4                                             1692 0.89  +2.5   Δ0.3     Comp.          Comp.              BET         55.3 m.sup.2 /g!                                1.3 186   11.2                                             1673 0.86  0      Δ0.8     Ex. 35          Ex. 23     Comp.          Comp.                 1.2 162   21.8                                             1630 0.85  -3.0   Δ1.2     Ex. 36          Ex. 27     Ex. 72          Ex. 39              Hexagonal barium ferrite particles                                1.2 186 9.6  1340 0.80  +1.0   Δ0.2     Ex. 73          Ex. 42               plate surface diameter                          0.05 μm                                1.1 205 5.8  1356 0.85  +2.7   Δ0.1     Ex. 74          Ex. 48              plate ratio 6 μm                                1.1 208 5.4  1375 0.87  +3.0   Δ0.1     Ex. 75          Ex. 48              Hc          1290 Oe                                1.2 214 5.2  1396 0.87  +2.8   Δ0     Ex. 76          Ex. 51              σs    58.2 emu/g                                1.1 200 6.0  1363 0.83  +2.6   Δ0.1     Comp.          Comp.              BET         50.8 m.sup.2 /g                                1.3 172 11.2 1333 0.76  0      Δ0.6     Ex. 37          Ex. 25     Comp.          Comp.                 1.3 146 32.2 314  0.74  -5.5   Δ1.1     Ex. 38          Ex. 28     __________________________________________________________________________

                                      TABLE 15     __________________________________________________________________________              Magnetic recording layer       Magnetic tape                                    Gloss                                        Surface                                             Magnetic     Examples                   Thick-                                    of  roughness                                             characteristic                                                        Vibration proofness     and  Under                 ness of                                    coating                                        coating                                             Coercive   Signal                                                               Dispersion     Compara-          coat                  coating                                    film                                        film force                                                  Squareness                                                        cording                                                               inop-     tive layer                 film                                    45°                                        Ra   (Hc) (Br/Bm)                                                        erty (10                                                               envelope     Examples          used              Magnestic particles used                                (μm)                                    (%) (nm) (Oe) (-)   output)                                                               (dB)     __________________________________________________________________________     Ex. 77          Ex. 40              Co-coated Fe.sub.3 O.sub.4 particles                                1.2 150 10.2 970  0.89  +2.2   Δ0.2     Ex. 78          Ex. 43               major axial diameter                          0.22 μm                                1.2 158 8.6  972  0.91  +4.5   Δ0.2     Ex. 79          Ex. 46              minor axial diameter                          0.030 μm                                1.2 164 8.0  981  0.92  +5.5   Δ0.2     Ex. 80          Ex. 49              Hc          915 Oe                                1.2 166 7.6  983  0.92  +5.9   Δ0.1     Ex. 81          Ex. 52              σs    81.6 emu/g                                1.2 156 8.8  966  0.90  +4.5   Δ0.1     Comp.          Comp.              BET         43.1 m.sup.2 /g!                                1.1 138 12.8 940  0.85  0      Δ0.9     Ex. 39          Ex. 24     Comp.          Comp.                 1.1 130 14.4 942  0.83  -0.9   Δ1.5     Ex. 40          Ex. 29     __________________________________________________________________________

                                      TABLE 16     __________________________________________________________________________              Magnetic recording layer       Magnetic tape                                    Gloss                                        Surface                                             Magnetic     Examples                   Thick-                                    of  roughness                                             characteristic                                                        Vibration proofness     and  Under                 ness of                                    coating                                        coating                                             Coercive   Signal                                                               Dispersion     Compara-          coat                  coating                                    film                                        film force                                                  Squareness                                                        cording                                                               inop-     tive layer                 film                                    45°                                        Ra   (Hc) (Br/Bm)                                                        erty (10                                                               envelope     Examples          used              Magnestic particles used                                (μm)                                    (%) (nm) (Oe) (-)   output)                                                               (dB)     __________________________________________________________________________     Ex. 82          Ex. 53              Magnetic metal particles                                1.1 226 5.8  1875 0.89  +1.5   Δ0.2     Ex. 83          Ex. 54               major axial diameter                          0.10 μm                                1.2 236 5.4  1910 0.91  +2.5   Δ0     Ex. 84          Ex. 55              minor axial diameter                          0.013 μm                                1.1 230 6.0  1865 0.88  +2.3   Δ0.2     Ex. 85          Ex. 56              Hc          1780 Oe                                1.1 218 6.8  1882 0.89  +1.2   Δ0.3     Ex. 86          Ex. 58              σs    125.6 emu/g                                1.2 200 7.6  1865 0.88  +0.8   Δ0.4     Ex. 87          Comp.              BET         51.5 m.sup.2 /g                                1.1 168 13.6 1803 0.85  0      Δ1.5          Ex. 23     Ex. 88          Comp.                 1.3 146 14.8 1796 0.83  -1.5   Δ1.5          Ex. 26     Ex. 89          Ex. 53              Hexagonal barium ferrite particles                                1.0 206 6.0  1430 0.85  +1.8   Δ0.3     Ex. 90          Ex. 54               plate surface diameter                          0.05 μm                                1.1 212 5.6  1486 0.87  +2.2   Δ0.1     Ex. 91          Ex. 55              plate ratio 6 μm                                1.0 206 6.0  1453 0.86  +2.1   Δ0.3     Ex. 92          Ex. 56              Hc          1380 Oe                                1.2 196 6.4  1460 0.85  +1.8   Δ0.5     Ex. 93          Ex. 58              σs    57.6 emu/g                                1.1 188 8.8  1446 0.83  +1.0   Δ0.3     Ex. 94          Comp.              BET         51.6 m.sup.2 /g                                1.0 146 18.8 1390 0.75  0      Δ1.0          Ex. 23     Ex. 95          Comp.                 1.2 126 21.4 1383 0.70  -4.8   Δ1.0          Ex. 26     __________________________________________________________________________ 

What is claimed is:
 1. Non-magnetic coated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles produced by adhering 0.01 to 20 wt %, calculated as Al, SiO₂ or Al and SiO₂, and based on the weight of the uncoated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles as a core, of an oxide or a hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surfaces of acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles; andsaid particles having an average major axial diameter of 0.05 to 0.25 μm, an average minor axial diameter of 0.010 to 0.035 μm, a particle size distribution in geometrical standard deviation of not more than 1.40, an aspect ratio of 2 to 20, a molecular weight-dependent parameter α to a binder resin which is a component of a non-magnetic undercoating layer in which said particles may be dispersed which has a value of not less than 0.5 and is represented by the following formula:

    As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α

wherein M represents the number-average molecular weight of said binder resin, As represents the saturation adsorption of said binder resin, and K₁ represents a constant used for measuring As and dependent on said binder resin and a solvent which also is a component for producing a non-magnetic undercoating layer,and wherein the molecular-weight-dependent parameter α is obtained by: (a) preparing at least three binder resin solutions having different concentrations Ci in the range of 0.01 to 5% of each of (i) an urethane resin having a number-average molecular weight of 15,000 and having sulfonate group, (ii) an urethane resin having a number-average molecular weight of 28,000 and having sulfonate group, and (iii) an urethane resin having a number-average molecular weight of 42,000 and having sulfonate group, using for each solution a mixed solvent of methyl ethyl ketone, toluene and cyclohexane in a weight ratio of 5:3:2; (b) to 56 g of each binder resin in step, (a) adding 20 g of nonmagnetic particles and dispersing the resultant solution uniformly to form a nonmagnetic coating composition until an adsorbed resin concentration on the surface of said nonmagnetic particles and a resin concentration in the binder solution are at equilibrium, then subjecting the obtained nonmagnetic coating composition to centrifugal separation at a rate of 10,000 rpm for 25 minutes using a centrifugal separator, and after attaining an equilibrium state between supernatant liquid and precipitated substance, removing the precipitated substance to determine an equilibrated binder concentration C by weight of the obtained supernatant liquid, wherein the difference between the binder concentration C of the supernatant liquid from the initial resin concentration Ci is an apparent resin-adsorption amount A of said nonmagnetic particles; (c) plotting values obtained in step (b) in a graph having an ordinate of the ratio (C/A) of the binder concentration C to the apparent resin adsorption amount A and an abscissa of the equilibrated binder concentration C, thereby obtaining a linear relationship between at least three plots, the inclination of the obtained straight-line in the graph corresponding to 1/As in the following Langmuir induction formula:

    C/A=(1/As)×C+(b 1/As·K.sub.2)

C=Equilibrated binder concentration of the supernatant liquid A=Apparent resin-adsorption amount As=Saturation adsorption amount K₂ =Constant(d) plotting the saturation adsorption amount As and the molecular weight M of the binder in a log-log table and obtaining the linear relationship between As and M, and thereafter determining the molecular weight-dependent parameter α from the inclination of the straight line.
 2. Non-magnetic coated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles according to claim 1, which are produced by(a) adding an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles to obtain a resultant suspension having a pH not less than 10, (b) adding an aqueous solution containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the obtained suspension, (c) adjusting the pH of the resultant suspension to approximately neutral thereby precipitating an oxide or hydroxide coating of Al, Si or both Al and Si onto the α-Fe₂ O₃ particles, (d) filtering out the particles coated with said oxide or hydroxide to obtain a solid substance, (e) water washing then drying said coated particles, and (f) compacting and pulverizing said coated particles by an edge runner mill.
 3. Non-magnetic coated acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles according to claim 1, which are produced by(a) adding an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing acicular or spindle-shaped α-Fe₂ O₃ particles to obtain a resultant suspension having a pH not less than 10, (b) adding an aqueous solution containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the obtained suspension, (c) adjusting the pH of the obtained suspension to approximately neutral under stirring thereby precipitating an oxide or hydroxide coating of Al, Si or both Al and Si onto the α-Fe₂ O₃ particles, (d) filtering out the coated particles with said oxide or hydroxide coating thereon, (e) washing with water and drying said coated particles, (f) compacting and pulverizing said coated particles by an edge runner mill, and (j) repeating steps (a) to (f) in that order at least twice.
 4. Non-magnetic coated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles coated with 0.01 to 50 wt %, calculated as Al, SiO₂, Zn or Zr, and based upon the weight of the uncoated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles, of a coating material selected from the group consisting of aluminum compounds, silica compounds, zinc compounds, zirconium compounds and a mixture thereof, or 0.01 to 20 wt %, calculated as carbon, and based on the weight of the uncoated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles, of a coating material selected from the group consisting of silane coupling agents, titanate coupling agents, aluminate coupling agents, zirconate coupling agents and a mixture thereof; andsaid particles having an average particle diameter of not more than 0.1 μm, a compressed density of 2.0 to 3.0 g/cm³ and a molecular weight-dependent parameter α to a binder resin which is a component of a non-magnetic undercoating layer in which said particles may be dispersed which has a value not less than 0.5 and is represented by the following formula:

    As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α

wherein M represents the number-average molecular weight of said binder resin, As represents the saturation adsorption of said binder resin, and K₁ represents a constant used for measuring As and dependent on the binder resin and a solvent which also is a component for producing a non-magnetic undercoating layerand wherein the molecular-weight-dependent parameter α is obtained by: (a) preparing at least three binder resin solutions having different concentrations Ci in the range of 0.01 to 5% of each of (i) an urethane resin having a number-average molecular weight of 15,000 and having sulfonate group, (ii) an urethane resin having a number-average molecular weight of 28,000 and having sulfonate group, and (iii) an urethane resin having a number-average molecular weight of 42,000 and having sulfonate group, using for each solution a mixed solvent of methyl ethyl ketone, toluene and cyclohexane in a weight ratio of 5:3:2; (b) to 56 g of each binder resin in step, (a) adding 20 g of nonmagnetic particles and dispersing the resultant solution uniformly to form a nonmagnetic coating composition until an adsorbed resin concentration on the surface of said nonmagnetic particles and a resin concentration in the binder solution are at equilibrium, then subjecting the obtained nonmagnetic coating composition to centrifugal separation at a rate of 10,000 rpm for 25 minutes using a centrifugal separator, and after attaining an equilibrium state between supernatant liquid and precipitated substance, removing the precipitated substance to determine an equilibrated binder concentration C by weight of the obtained supernatant liquid, wherein the difference between the binder concentration C of the supernatant liquid from the initial resin concentration Ci is an apparent resin-adsorption amount A of said nonmagnetic particles; (c) plotting values obtained in step (b) in a graph having an ordinate of the ratio (C/A) of the binder concentration C to the apparent resin adsorption amount A and an abscissa of the equilibrated binder concentration C, thereby obtaining a linear relationship between at least three plots, the inclination of the obtained straight-line in the graph corresponding to 1/As in the following Langmuir induction formula:

    C/A=(1/As)×C+(1/As·K.sub.2)

C=Equilibrated binder concentration of the supernatant liquid A=Apparent resin-adsorption amount As=Saturation adsorption amount K₂ =Constant(d) plotting the saturation adsorption amount As and the molecular weight M of the binder in a log-log table and obtaining the linear relationship between As and M, and thereafter determining the molecular weight-dependent parameter α from the inclination of the straight line.
 5. Non-magnetic coated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles produced by adhering 0.01 to 20 wt %, calculated as Al, SiO₂ or Al and SiO₂ and based on the weight of the uncoated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles, of an oxide or a hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surfaces of BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles, andsaid particles having an average particle diameter of not more than 0.1 μm, a compressed density of 2.0 to 3.0 g/cm³ and a molecular weight-dependent parameter α to a binder resin which is a component of a non-magnetic undercoating layer in which said particles may be dispersed which has a value of not less than 0.5 and is represented by the following formula:

    As=K.sub.1 ·M.sup.α

wherein M represents the number-average molecular weight of said binder resin, As represents the saturation adsorption of said binder resin, and K¹ represents a constant used for measuring As and dependent on the binder resin and a solvent which also is a component for producing a non-magnetic undercoating layer, and wherein the molecular-weight-dependent parameter α is obtained by: (a) preparing at least three binder resin solutions having different concentrations Ci in the range of 0.01 to 5% of each of (i) an urethane resin having a number-average molecular weight of 15,000 and having sulfonate group, (ii) an urethane resin having a number-average molecular weight of 28,000 and having sulfonate group, and (iii) an urethane resin having a number-average molecular weight of 42,000 and having sulfonate group, using for each solution a mixed solvent of methyl ethyl ketone, toluene and cyclohexane in a weight ratio of 5:3:2; (b) to 56 g of each binder resin in step, (a) adding 20 g of nonmagnetic particles and dispersing the resultant solution uniformly to form a nonmagnetic coating composition until an adsorbed resin concentration on the surface of said nonmagnetic particles and a resin concentration in the binder solution are at equilibrium, then subjecting the obtained nonmagnetic coating composition to centrifugal separation at a rate of 10,000 rpm for 25 minutes using a centrifugal separator, and after attaining an equilibrium state between supernatant liquid and precipitated substance, removing the precipitated substance to determine an equilibrated binder concentration C by weight of the obtained supernatant liquid, wherein the difference between the binder concentration C of the supernatant liquid from the initial resin concentration Ci is an apparent resin-adsorption amount A of said nonmagnetic particles; (c) plotting values obtained in step (b) in a graph having an ordinate of the ratio (C/A) of the binder concentration C to the apparent resin adsorption amount A and an abscissa of the equilibrated binder concentration C, thereby obtaining a linear relationship between at least three plots, the inclination of the obtained straight-line in the graph corresponding to 1/As in the following Langmuir induction formula:

    C/A=(1/As)×C+(1/As·K.sub.2)

C=Equilibrated binder concentration of the supernatant liquid A=Apparent resin-adsorption amount As=Saturation adsorption amount K₂ =Constant(d) plotting the saturation adsorption amount As and the molecular weight M of the binder in a log-log table and obtaining the linear relationship between As and M, and thereafter determining the molecular weight-dependent parameter α from the inclination of the straight line.
 6. Non-magnetic coated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles according to claim 5 which are produced by(a) adding an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles to obtain a resultant suspension having a pH of not less than 10, (b) adding an aqueous solution containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the resultant suspension, (c) adjusting the pH of the resultant suspension to approximately neutral under stirring thereby precipitating an oxide or hydroxide coating containing Al, Si or both Al and Si onto the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles, (d) filtering out the coated particles with said oxide or hydroxide coating deposited, precipitated or both deposited and precipitated on the surface thereof, (e) water washing then drying the coated particles, and (f) compacting and pulverizing the coated particles by an edge runner mill so as to adhere an oxide or hydroxide coating containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surface of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles.
 7. Non-magnetic coated BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles according to claim 5 which are produced by(a) adding an aqueous alkali solution to an aqueous suspension containing the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles to obtain a resultant suspension having a pH of to not less than 10, (b) adding an aqueous solution containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the resultant suspension, (c) adjusting the pH of the resultant suspension to approximately neutral under stirring thereby precipitating an oxide or hydroxide coating containing Al, Si or both Al and Si onto the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles, (d) filtering out the coated particles with said oxide or hydroxide deposited, precipitated or both deposited and precipitated on the surface thereof, (e) water washing then drying the coated particles, (f) compacting and pulverizing the coated particles by an edge runner mill so as to adhere an oxide or hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surface of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles, and (g) repeating steps (a) to (f) at least twice to adhere the oxide or hydroxide containing Al, Si or both Al and Si to the surface of the BaO.4.5Fe₂ O₃ particles. 